|
Record Hurricanes
Hurakan was the Mayan god of thunderstorms and whirlwinds, as well
as the creator of earth and the life upon it. Hurakan has been in all
our thoughts of late. The scale of destruction and human tragedy
suffered this hurricane season is almost beyond our comprehension.
Though our attention has rightfully been focused on the disruption
and loss of life, widespread destruction has also been visited upon
records. Pictures of the destruction to archives and libraries are
disheartening (see: http://www.coshrc.org/arc/hurricane-MSvisit-photos.htm).
One of the early reports out of Louisiana indicated that the New
Orleans Notorial Archives had been damaged and its records, including
early land records and current title records, flooded. Other early
reports noted the extensive damage to court records throughout the
region, as well as to local manuscript repositories and archives.
Steve Bruno, custodian of the Notorial Archives, was quoted in the
New Orleans Times-Picayune as saying "there won’t be any [real estate]
transactions until this problem is solved. Sure, a lot of people are
going to want to sell and a lot of speculators are going to want to
buy," but without the records "it isn’t going to happen."
The loss of court records also had an immediate impact. Inmates
were evacuated from New Orleans flooded jails, but without court
records (or a court system for that matter) there was no way to tell
what charges each inmate faced. Accused murderers were mixed in with
those facing drunk charges. But without court records it was, in the
words of one official, like "taking a jail and shaking it up in a
fruit-basket turn-over, so no one has any idea who these people are or
why they’re here."
Court records in general took a heavy hit and a September 9th New
York Times article noted that "a vast universe" of court records had
been lost. "Court proceedings from divorce to murder trials, to
corporate litigation, to custody cases will be indefinitely halted and
when proceedings resume lawyers will face prodigious—if not
insurmountable—obstacles in finding witnesses and principals and in
recovering evidence." Beyond court records, it was reported that a
third of Louisiana’s lawyers lost their offices
The scale of destruction and the lack of coordination delayed
attempts to salvage records, creating additional problems. Mold, for
example, begins to form fairly quickly after water damage,
particularly in a hot and humid climate. The Notorial Archives, had a
disaster recovery plan calling for the use of refrigerated trucks to
freeze-dry water-soaked documents to allow for later recovery. The
trucks, however, were turned back by troops trying to keep people away
from the flooded area. The records were eventually retrieved and are
now housed in refrigerator trucks or at a freeze-dry facility in
Chicago.
In truth the degree of destruction over such a wide area undid most
plans. As H.T. Holmes, the Mississippi state archivist reported, "None
of our reactions are following the textbook recovery lessons, but this
‘melt-down’ situation over such a huge area is not a situation
previously thought probable by most folks down here." A recovery team
of archivists visiting Mississippi three weeks after Katrina reported
that "collections typically were either lost entirely or survived the
storm but were damaged subsequently by high humidity and mold…Much of
the damage to records came from a storm surge that swept through
buildings, destroying their contents, and then retreated. This
suggests that conditions may be different in New Orleans, where the
water resulted from a broken levee rather than a storm surge and where
damage has probably resulted from standing water rather than surging
water."
The archivists visiting Mississippi reported that "there was little
evidence of paper in the debris surrounding homes and business. Shreds
of fabric and plastic were caught in trees, but it appears that the
power of the storm surge completely destroyed paper." Interestingly,
the news story on court records reported that law offices with
computers (and off-site back-up) are better positioned to recover than
those offices totally reliant on paper records.
Archivists have launched a variety of efforts to assist in document
recovery and restoration. The Society of American Archivists has
established a grant fund to support stricken repositories and is
accepting contributions at: https://www.archivists.org/katrina/contribute.asp
The Council of State Archivists (nee the Council of State Historical
Records Coordinators) provides a variety of flood-related information
on its web site at: http://www.coshrc.org/.
Being in Vermont allows for some distant musings on the impact of
hurricanes on records. We have, for years, tried to alert state and
municipal officials, as well as citizens, about the value of archival
records. The loss of records relating to titles to land, to the court
system and to local history provides a real life, and tragic, example
of that argument.
How current are our own disaster plans and do they envision a broad
scale catastrophe or only one localized to our building? What if the
land-based phone system has been destroyed, or the roads are
impassable or the area sealed off for emergency response reasons? Have
we built mutual support plans when more than one repository is damaged
(the Rutland County Clerks’ Association was working on a county-wide
response team a few years ago; it would be interesting to hear how
their plan has progressed).
The survival of computer records, at least those which were
backed-up outside the immediate region, suggests that properly managed
electronic records may have some advantages in the event of a
disaster. I hasten to add, however, that the key phrase is "properly
managed." We have already experienced a wide range of "quiet
disasters" as improperly managed electronic records are lost with the
implementation of each new "generation" of hardware and software.
Widespread loss of electricity or phone lines may also complicate the
restoration of computer systems (does your disaster plan address how
you would respond to the loss of computer hardware even if the
software survived off-site?).
The events of the last few weeks should make all of us revisit our
disaster mitigation and response plans. We should also give pause to
celebrate the dedicated archivists and recordkeepers of the Gulf coast
who are struggling to save their records even when confronting the
loss of their own homes and communities.
Table of Contents |
Past Issues of
Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|
1. Building rented by church for recreational program is not exempt
from property tax. The law permits property owned or "kept" by a
church to be exempt from local property taxes if it is used for
specific purpose listed in the law. Even if rental property can be
considered property "kept" by the church, the recreational center
would not be exempt because the law does not exempt property held by
a church for recreational uses. 32 V.S.A. § 3832(2) It is an open
question whether it may be possible to exempt the property from
taxation through town vote. That is because although property used
for recreational purposes may be exempt by vote of the town, the use
of property is generally determined by looking at the owner – not
the occupant. In this case the owner is using the property as rental
property, which is not exempt. 32 V.S.A. § 3832(7)
2. Property purchased by a church after April 1st
is not exempt until the next tax year. Although churches and
other property used for religions purposes is exempt from property
tax, when a church purchases property this exemption does not begin
to apply until April 1st following the
purchase. The law does not provide a mechanism for changing exempt
status in the middle of a tax year. Indeed, a church cannot even
seek abatement of these taxes since the change in status of the
owners is a statutorily recognized reason to grant abatement. 24
V.S.A. §1535 Only when the listers prepare the next year’s grand
list, the property can be listed as exempt under 32 V.S.A. §3802(4)
and 3832
3. Property tax exemptions for volunteer fire department property
must be voted at Town Meeting. Volunteer fire departments that
are independent of the town (i.e. not a town department) are not
automatically exempt from property taxation. Rather, the exemption
can be voted for 10 years the first time and thereafter for
five-year periods. The Vermont Listers Handbook provides a good
discussion of property tax exemptions including a chart giving the
source of funding for education property tax liability for locally
voted exemptions. The handbook also includes a chapter on properties
that are exempt under state or federal law, and another chapter on
exemptions that must be voted by the town. 32 V.S.A. §3840
4. Town vote to exempt property will not remove assessed value
from calculation of town’s education tax liability. When a town
votes to exempt property from taxation it can only exempt the
property from municipal tax liability. The town vote will not remove
the assessed value from the calculation of the town’s education tax
liability, and the property owner will not be exempt from paying the
education tax on his or her property. 32 V.S.A. § 5404a
5. Board of abatement may act by majority vote of a quorum of the
board. Most municipal boards require the concurrence of a
majority of the board to act. However, 24 V.S.A. § 1533 provides
that only a majority of the quorum of a board of abatement is needed
for it to decide a matter. Figuring out how to calculate what
constitutes a quorum of the board of abatement can be confusing.
Like other municipal boards, a quorum of the board is a majority of
all of the members of the board. Members of the board of abatement
include the BCA (clerk, selectboard, and justices), the listers and
the treasurer. The number of justices depend on the size of your
town - so presuming you have 10 justices, plus three selectboard
members and three listers, the total number of the board would be 18
and a quorum of the board would be 10. The town would therefore need
10 people in order to convene the meeting of the board, but it would
need only six to agree on a particular course of action. In the
alternative, the board of abatement is deemed, by law, to have a
quorum if a majority of the listers and a majority of the
selectboard members and treasurer are present.
6. Board of abatement exercises discretion when deciding whether
to abate taxes. 24 V.S.A § 1535 sets out a number of
circumstances in which a board of abatement may choose to abate the
taxes of a property owner. The statute does not require abatement
under any circumstances, and courts have affirmed the board’s right
to exercise discretion in these matters. Abatement is meant to be an
equitable remedy, used only in the most unusual cases - as in a fire
or where a survivor is temporarily unable to access the assets of an
estate while it is in probate. It is not meant to be a way for the
town to subsidize taxpayers who can no longer afford the taxes on
their property. On occasion the delinquent tax collector may request
an abatement to clear up his or her records when a delinquent tax
payer cannot be found or if the taxpayer’s property has no value and
the delinquent tax payer has no other assets to be taken.
7. Board may grant partial abatement. The board of abatement
may abate, in whole or in part, taxes from the current or prior
years so long as one of the statutory reasons for granting abatement
applies. When taxes from a prior year are abated, the board of
abatement may choose to give the taxpayer a cash refund, or the
board may provide a credit towards the current and future year’s
taxes. 24 V.S.A. § 1535
8. Conditional abatement may be permissible. Recently, a town
asked whether a conditional abatement can be granted. That is,
whether the board could agree to abate taxes unless the property is
sold within the tax year, or unless the property owner’s insurance
company compensates the owner for the loss. The law is not clear on
this issue. However, since the law does not clearly preclude this
approach, until a court considers the issue we advised that the
board could go ahead with a conditional abatement when a particular
situation might warrant such an approach. 24 V.S.A. § 1535
9. Town will be liable to pay state education tax when it abates
town and school tax. The Board of Abatement has a lot of
discretion when it is deciding whether and how to abate taxes on a
property. While the board of abatement may only abate taxes for the
reasons listed in the statute (see 24 V.S.A. §§ 1533-36) if the
board chooses to abate it may do so in full or in part. This means
the board can choose to abate only the town portion of the taxes. If
the board abates the entire tax (including the education tax) the
town will still be liable to pay out to the school and state (if
applicable) the education portion of the tax amount.
10. No voter approval is required for borrowing for highway
equipment. Municipal financing law was amended as of July 1,
2001, so that a Selectboard can now approve borrowing for purchases
of equipment for highway equipment without going back to the voters
for approval. 24 V.S.A. §1786a. This is a very limited delegation of
powers and can only be used for equipment to maintain or construct
highways or bridges within the town.
11. Unused highway funds may be carried into the next fiscal
year, but they may only be used for highway purposes. 19 V.S.A.
§ 312 provides that "the funds raised from town highway taxes shall
not be used for any purpose other than that for which the tax was
voted, subject to the provisions of this chapter. If in any year
money so voted is not expended, it shall be applied for the same
purpose the following year." Accordingly, unlike other town funds
which may not be carried forward from year to year, a town with
excess highway funds may spend them in the next year without
additional voter approval.
12. Selectboard can decide to pave a road without town vote.
It is the responsibility of the selectboard to construct and
maintain the roads of the town. Although there is a public process
involved when a board wishes to change the classification of a town
highway, no public process is required (beyond a decision made
during a public meeting of the board) when the board decides that a
particular road should be paved. 19 V.S.A. § 304.
13. Landowner can gate a town road with selectboard’s permission.
The selectboard can create pent roads in a town by granting
permission to a landowner to erect stiles, or unlocked gates and
bars on a town road. Landowners used to request the board to permit
them to gate a road when they owned both sides of a highway and used
the fields for grading. Today, most requests for pent roads are made
in an effort to slow down ATV traffic on class 4 roads and trails.
The board can make regulations governing the use of pent roads and
can establish penalties not to exceed $50.00, for noncompliance. The
permission to pent a road must be given in writing and it must be
recorded in the town clerk’s office. 19 V.S.A. § 304(5)
14. Parking regulations must be made by ordinance. The
selectboard has the authority to regulate parking and on town roads.
Although the law specifies that the board can make "special
regulations as to the operation, use and parking of motor vehicles
on highways under their jurisdiction," courts have said that these
regulations must be made by ordinance. 19 V.S.A. § 304(6)
15. Selectboard may appoint acting zoning administrator.
When a zoning administrator has a conflict of interest or needs a
permit for his own property, the planning commission may nominate,
and the selectboard may appoint an acting zoning administrator for
the limited purpose of handling the matters in which the zoning
administrator feels he or she has a conflict. 24 V.S.A.
§4448.
16. Selectboard should adopt policy for use of town property.
It is a best practice for each legislative body, selectboard, school
board, or other public body that owns buildings, to adopt a policy
outlining requirements for use of town or school property by other
groups. It is constitutionally permissible for a board to
prohibit any and all use by outside groups. However, the town must
have a good reason to permit some groups, but not others, use of
town property. For example, it is reasonable and acceptable to limit
use of certain rooms or spaces to groups of less than 30, or to
meetings ending not later than 9 p.m. However, it may be
discriminatory to allow the Boy Scouts to meet in a room, but to
turn down a political caucus or a religious organization.
17. Village tax rate set using town grand list. Most villages
in Vermont set the village tax rate using the grand list assessments
prepared by the town listers. If a resident grieves his
taxes, and the listers or BCA make an adjustment lowering the
property assessment, the grand list will be adjusted and the village
must also lower the assessed amount.
18. A BCA inspection committee must view entire property. As
part of the tax appeal process, three members of an inspection
committee must inspect the property that is subject to the appeal
and report back to the full board of civil authority that is
considering the tax appeal. If, after notice, an appellant refuses
to allow the inspection committee to inspect whatever parts of the
property (both outside and inside) it wants to inspect, the appeal
shall be deemed withdrawn. 32 V.S.A. §4404. Additionally, although
it is best if the inspection committee would visit the property all
together, this is not mandatory, and they can return a second time
within the 30 days given for the inspection, if necessary.
19. BCA may increase, decrease or sustain the appraisal upon
appeal. Once the taxpayer raises the issue of the property’s
valuation, the BCA must make findings to support what the BCA
believes to be the correct valuation of the property, even if that
amount is higher than the lister’s assessment. The same is true for
further appeals to the State Board of Appraisers or the Superior
Court. 323 V.S.A. §4409
20. Voters can vote to disapprove a newly adopted ordinance, but
it may not initiate an ordinance (except for an ethics ordinance) or
initiate the revocation of an existing ordinance. The
selectboard is given primary authority for the adoption and
revocation of ordinances for the town. There is no public hearing
process required when an ordinance is adopted. However, once
adopted, the board must post the ordinance (or a concise summary of
it) in five public places, and publish it in a local newspaper, so
that the public can decide whether to petition for a vote on the
issue. If, within 44 days, the voters present a petition signed by 5
percent of the legal to disapprove the ordinance, the board must
hold a special election so that the voters may decide whether the
ordinance should become effective. 24 V.S.A. §§1972, 1973 (Chapter
59)
21. Registered voters in Vermont do not lose residency for voting
purposes solely by living outside of the United States. Once a
person has registered to vote in Vermont, he or she can keep that
residency for voting purposes even if he or she lives outside of the
United States with no intent ever to return to the states. Until the
voter returns to reside in the United States, or gives up United
States citizenship, the voter can remain on the checklist and vote
by absentee ballot in the town in which the voter last resided,
regardless of his or her reason for living outside of the United
States. 17 V.S.A. § 2122
22. Overseas voter who returns must register to vote in the
jurisdiction of his or her current residence. Once an overseas
voter returns to the United States he or she must register where the
voter resides. 17 V.S.A. § 2122 For example, if a member of
the armed forces who has been in Germany for 20 years retires and
moves back to the United States, that person must register to vote
in the place in which he or she now resides. If you send a letter as
part of your purging process and the person returns your form giving
another town or state as his or her residence, you can remove that
person from your checklist.
23. A citizen who wishes to be added to the checklist cannot
refuse to take the voter’s oath. When the court struck down
Vermont’s durational residency requirement as unconstitutional, the
court found that the constitutional requirement to take the voter’s
oath was fine. A voter only needs to take the oath once, but each
citizen must take it before being added to the checklist for the
first time in Vermont. (If you move to another town in Vermont, you
do not need to take the oath again.) A notary public, member of the
board of civil authority, or other person authorized to administer
oaths must complete and sign the form stating that the new voter has
sworn or affirmed the oath and the form must be received by your
Town Clerk before the new voter can receive an absentee ballot or
vote in person for the first time in Vermont.
24. Permits are required for large public events. The
organizers of a commercial public event or gathering expecting 2,000
or more attendees must apply for a permit from the Department of
Public Safety at least 30 days before the event is held. The
Department of Public Safety may grant the permit, deny the permit,
or grant the permit with conditions, such as providing a bond or
other financial security. If a town wants to regulate smaller
assemblies, the town needs to enact local ordinances or regulations.
In our monthly Opinions we provide what we believe the law requires based
upon our legal judgment, years of observing Vermont’s local government
practices, and Vermont Court decisions. This information is intended as a
reference guide only and should not replace the advice of legal counsel.
Table of Contents | Past Issues
of Opinions | Secretary of State's Homepage
Tune-up for Towns
Does Your Town Need a Tune-Up? Part 3
( Excerpted from
Tune Up for Towns, a publication of the Office of the Secretary
of State. To obtain the full publication, visit
www.sec.state.vt.us or call Kathryn
at 802-828-2148)
You go to the dentist twice a year for a checkup, usually not
because you have a known problem but because you want to know if
there is one you haven’t noticed. Some annual checkup is also
probably done on your furnace, your car, and your dog. So why not
the town? Give your town a legal tune-up by review the checklist
below.
Last month we provided a checklist of items to consider to ensure
that you are following the legal requirements of Vermont’s open
meeting laws. This month’s checklist will cover considerations for
selectboard. As with last month's list, some of the items are not
the law; they are simply recommendations based on others’ bad
experience. The list below is just the start. Next month we will
look at town meeting . . .
A Legal Tune up for Town Clerks:
Town Clerk’s Tune Up
þ Have the oaths of the town clerk and assistant town
clerk been deposited with the county clerk? See 24 V.S.A. § 1151.
þ How much of a usual delay is there between the filing
for recording and the actual recording of deeds and other
conveyances in the town clerk’s office? The statute does not specify
a timetable, but this is the most common complaint about clerks’
work. Similarly, is there a day book or check-in sheet used to list
documents filed for recording as they come in? Are the documents
stamped or marked as of the time of filing for recording?
þ Has an assistant town clerk been appointed? Does the
assistant know how much of the office’s duties the clerk is willing
to delegate to him or her? Is there any regular course of training
for assistants?
þ Does the clerk stick to published office hours? Is there
coverage for periods when the clerk can’t be present?
þ Are minutes of all board and commission meetings filed
with the clerk? Are records of grants and other award? No law yet
says they must, but unless the clerk takes steps to secure these
records, there will be no chance of preserving them for the future.
þ What is the condition of the index to land records? Has
a card index been compiled, and if so for what period? Is there any
plan to computerize the index? Or to convert the card or general
indices to other formats?
þ Is there a plan for restoring town records, particularly
those relating to town meetings and deeds and other conveyances? Is
regular progress made on appropriating money and arranging for the
care and rebinding of these records?
þ Is there a written description of the indexing standards
made available to those searching title? Does the office have a
written policy about how it will handle documents that the clerk
recognizes contain errors (not required by law)?
þ Have you reviewed and posted your fee schedule to ensure
that you are charging the proper fees and the public is aware of
them?Tip of the
Month
This month's tip comes from Marshfield Town Clerk, Bobbi
Brimblecomb:
"I send an email when my office will be closed for training, etc.
I know at least one clerk faxes people - that works too if you can
figure out how to program the fax machine. I just set up a list in
my email address book and ask attorneys if they want to be included.
Several have told me that they appreciate it."
To submit a tip, please email Clyde Jenne (VMCTA President) at
hartlandvtclerk@vermontel.net or mail it to: Clyde Jenne,Town of
Hartland, 1 Quechee Road, Hartland, VT 05048
|
Vermont Public Service Awards
The Secretary of State's Vermont Public Service Awards (VPSA)
program honors local officials who have provided their communities
with 20-plus years of service. Often times those who serve their
town, village or city do not receive the recognition and thanks of
which they are so deserving. But what would we do without these
hard-working individuals who devote hours of their week and years of
their life to making sure things run smoothly in Vermont's towns and
cities?
We have begun our fall VPSA awards ceremonies which will occur in
towns throughout Vermont during the autumn and spring of 2005-06. So
far, over 1,000 names have been submitted to our office!
Approximately one-fourth of these nominees are still serving,
although it has been five years since the last round of awards.
Those still sereving will receive an extra recognition at the
ceremony.
Please note that there have been several scheduling changes for
some of the events. (These are bolded and marked with an asterisk
below.)
Thank you for your help in making these award ceremonies a very
special occasion for the award winners! Remember that it is not too
late to participate! If you are still interested in submitting
nominations from your town, please contact Kathryn Mathieson at
802-828-2148 or email her at kmathieson@sec.state.vt.us for more
information and to obtain nomination forms.
Autumn 2005 Event Date Location
October 6 Middlebury
October 11 Johnson
*October 17 *Montpelier
October 27 Lyndon
November 2 Rutland
November 9 Fairlee
*November 14 *Burlington
Spring 2006 VPSA ceremonies include:
April 6 St. Albans
April 12 Barton
TBA West Dover
*TBA *Springfield
* Denotes change from originally scheduled date.
Clarifications:
(1) The Office of the Secretary of State sends out invitations to
the event. After nominee invitations are sent out, a packet
containing extra invitations for interested parties is sent out to
all town clerks who nominated individuals from their towns. State
representatives and senators from your area are also invited.
(2) Please note the schedule changes in the box to the left. All
invitations sent out reflect the correct date.
(3) If the event you are attending follows a MOM Seminar
(Johnson, Rutland, and Fairlee), there is NO cost to attend the VPSA
ceremony.
Janel Johnson
Jjohnson@sec.state.vt.us
(802)828-1296
Table of Contents | Past Issues of
Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|