Office of the Vermont
Secretary of State -
www.sec.state.vt.us
26 Terrace Street, Drawer 09,
Montpelier, VT 05609-1101 : Phone 802-828-2363
|
|
|
Volume 6 Number 5
May 2004
|
Message from the Secretary |
Table of Contents |
|
Every once in awhile we are asked
about how the Secretary of State’s office began to publish opinions
on issues of local government law. Opinions began as a formal
publication in 1981 by then Secretary of State Jim Douglas, and his
deputy Paul Gillies. The belief then was that by publishing
questions and answers from the previous month, it would let people
know what was going on in local government around the state, and
would help officials learn from the experiences of others. They also
hoped that this information would eliminate some of the telephone
calls that can – and sometimes still do – consume this office.
I can tell by the number of calls and cards we have received in
response to our re-institution of Opinions that local officials and
citizens continue to value learning about the ever-changing
landscape of local government law and practice. Perhaps it is
because, when we see our own town’s challenges reflected in the
stories of other communities, we feel less alone in our work.
Though I hope our Opinions are interesting to read and sometimes
help you solve a problem or avoid a mistake, they are not rulings
that are binding on towns or citizens like a decision of the court.
Rather, when we issue opinions they are just that – our opinions. We
have no power to force citizens or officials to do the right thing –
to treat each other civilly - to follow the law. Rather, through our
opinions, Deputy Secretary Bill Dalton, Director of Elections Kathy
DeWolfe, and I share with you what we believe the law requires based
on our best legal judgment and from our many years of observing
Vermont’s local governments and following the decisions of our
courts.
The thoughts expressed in our opinions also reflect our philosophy
of openness and fairness in government and in the inherent value of
local control. Whenever there is a question about what the law says
or what is required of an official, our advice is conservative. We
try to keep you out of trouble by counseling prudence over
risk-taking, openness over secrecy and due process over bureaucratic
expediency.
The citizen volunteers who run our local governments in Vermont
deserve all the support we can give them. It is my hope that
Opinions offers them that support and, in doing so, helps to
strengthen our town governments.
Reprinted from May 2002

Deborah L. Markowitz
Secretary of State
Table of Contents
|
Past Issues of
Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
NEW!
Download May
Opinions in PDF
format
(PDF
help)
Add Me to the Email Subscription List!
Message from the Secretary
Voice from the Vault
by State Archivist Gregory Sanford
Opinions of
Opinions
VLCT Upcoming Events
High School Voter Registration Week
Property Sales and Declaration of Vermont Homestead
An Apology to Connie Quimby
Municipally - Based Community Restorative Justice
Centers
Tip of the Month
New Stickers
Available for 2004 Election !
Mailing List
Updates
Calendar
Opinions
Newsletter Home Page
|
|
|
Voice from the Vault
By Gregory Sanford, State Archivist |
|
The Other Side of the Table
Yesterday was my birthday. Another milestone in my late youth (a
designation arrived at by dividing chronology by maturity), I marked
it by spending the morning researching municipal records. This may
seem a rather staid way of celebrating, but it was the perfect gift.
I confess I have done little research in municipal records; indeed,
I do little research nowadays except in responding to requests for
information. So it was a joy to hunker down with volumes of land
records and minutes in search of Jerusalem, a religious community
thought to exist between Lord’s and Devil’s hills in the early 19th
Century. My pleasure was enhanced by having Paul Gillies serve as my
guide through the records.
Armed with local memories, a few names, and the location of some
cellar holes, we worked our way patiently back through time. As it
rained outside, the present slowly dissolved as we moved from volume
to volume tracing changing land use and ownership patterns. Some
promising leads petered out, others emerged. The handwriting, some
legible, some a challenge, changed as clerks came and went. The depth
of description went from detailed boundary descriptions to the vague
recordings of the late 19th Century, to the
pre-1850 practice of referencing original lots.
In the end, a documented community eluded us. The names we had
appeared briefly during the first decade of the 1800s as landowners
and town officers, but their property was not where Jerusalem was
believed to be located. After a son’s term as hayward, all mention of
that family ended. Instead we got caught up in the intense land
speculation of another family, father and son, who bought, sold and
leased property throughout the town during the 19th
Century. Their ownership of the Jerusalem area persisted through that
time.
As an archivist, there is a value in occasionally sitting on the
other side of the research table. My appreciation of how well the town
is served by our clerk was greatly enhanced; the volumes were well
conserved and the records complete and orderly. So was my appreciation
of the unique vantage point municipal records provide on the history
of communities. Though, in this case, the records were silent on the
information I sought, the experience reminded me of the complex
interplay of record, memory and landscape that make up our sense of
community. There is, among the older members of the community, a
strong memory of Jerusalem. Details of that memory, passed from
grandparent to parent to child, embrace an isolated religious
community, perhaps squatters upon the land. There remain community
memories of an outbreak of bubonic plague and of graves marked by
stones arranged in patterns designed to halt the spread of the
disease.
These personal memories are anchored in the cemeteries and cellar
holes, though the exact location of each resides in the fragile
memories of older residents. The landscape also offers clues, from the
wonderful juxtaposition of Lord’s Hill, Devil’s Hill and Jerusalem to
other local landmarks such as Debby’s Hill and Debby’s Spring, named
after one of the purported community members. The records helped
confirm some of these names, including references to the Jerusalem
Pasture.
The records offered glimpses of local economies with their
reference to pasture land, sawmills, sugaring equipment and old roads.
They also revealed a surprisingly high level of land speculation, at
least among the members of one family, for over a century.
The experience even provided useful context to current discussions
over scanning and electronic records. In some cases faded ink and
crabbed handwriting will be a challenge to scanning. The thought that,
at some future point, I might be able to access the records from home,
rather than taking a day off, certainly had an appeal. And yet, if
that day comes, something will be lost. That tactile sense of holding
records, of holding history, and having a direct connection to the
long forgotten town officers who created the records will be lost. So
will the camaraderie of the clerk’s office and the ability to ask
questions of those most familiar with the records.
And so, even though Jerusalem remained elusive, it was a wonderful
day. To my town clerk in particular, and to all clerks in general,
thank you for all you do and for helping a man, in the fullness of
late youth, enjoy his birthday.
Table of Contents
|
Past Issues of
Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|
Opinions of
Opinions
|
|
1. Municipal public library may not charge residents for its
basic services. A public library is defined as "any library
established and maintained by a municipality or by a private
association, corporation or group to provide basic library services
free of charge to all residents of a municipality or a community and
which receives its annual financial support in whole or in part from
public funds. 22 V.S.A. § 101. This means that a municipal public
library may not charge residents for its basic services. Basic
services have been treated by the Vermont Department of Libraries as
including all items a library circulates (e.g., print and nonprint
materials), reference service, interlibrary loan, programming
(except for recovery of the cost of materials), and public access
computing (including internet access). This rule is consistent with
the authority of other municipal entities. Municipal boards only
have those authorities directly granted by the legislature. This
means that fees cannot be charged by municipalities unless
specifically authorized in statute or directly implied by some other
authority granted by the legislature. Note that a municipal library
may charge non-residents a borrowing fee and it may also charge rent
in the event that it has extra space available for non-library use.
2. Upon election to offices that are incompatible a person
must resign from one, creating a vacancy. A person may run for
two incompatible offices, but upon election, the official
must resign from one of the positions. This creates a vacancy
that must be filled according to statutory procedures.
3. Vacancy is not filled by next higher vote-getter. When a
newly elected official resigns the runner-up or next highest vote
getter does not ?move
up" to become the winner. For town officer vacancies the selectboard
posts the vacancy within 10 days of its creation, and then appoints
a person to fill the term of office until the next election. 24
V.S.A. § 961 and §963. For town school board member vacancies the
selectboard, with the advice of the remaining school board members,
must within 30 days appoint a person to fill the position until the
next election. 16 V.S.A. § 424. For union school district vacancies
the clerk of the union district notifies the selectboard of the town
which elected the original incumbent and within 30 days the
selectboard, with the advice of the town or incorporated district
school board, appoints a person to fill the vacancy until the next
election.
4. Errors or omissions in the warning or notice can be cured by a
vote to validate. If errors of omission or noncompliance with
the statutory requirements for Notice and/or Warning for the Annual
Meeting were made, you can look at 17 V.S.A. § 2662, validation of
municipal meetings, to see if you can cure the errors by using the
procedures in this section. Under section 2662 an article can be
added to the next annual or special meeting warning with the
wording, "shall the action taken at the meeting of _________Town (or
city or district) held on ____________(date), in spite of the fact
that _____________________(state the error or omission), and any act
or action of the municipal officers or agents pursuant thereto be
re-adopted, ratified and confirmed."
We strongly suggest that School Boards and Selectboards carefully
review the draft warning in order to avoid unnecessary errors with
respect to meeting locations, polling places, times of meetings,
dates, and budget amounts. We also recommend that whoever brings the
Warning to the town clerks office confirms the meeting times and
places with the Town Clerk in order to avoid unnecessary errors or
conflicts.
5. Clerk must record deed and survey that is properly submitted
for recording. A town clerk must record properly submitted deed
and survey (conforming to statutory requirements in 27 V.S.A. §341)
even if an abutter objects that it contains incorrect information.
The recording function is a ministerial duty that allows the
documents to provide notice to others. If a correction needs to be
made, a new corrected deed or survey must be submitted for
recording.
6. A person in a correctional institution must register to vote
in the last town he/she resided. Vermont law provides that "a
person can neither gain nor lose residency…while in a correctional
institution." 17 V.S.A. §2121 and 2122(a). There is an additional,
more specific, provision in 28 V.S.A. §807 that states that a person
cannot register to vote in the town where the correctional facility
is located. While some attorneys consider this provision to be
unconstitutional, it has not been challenged in court so is presumed
valid.
7. A special process must be followed in order for the
municipality to vote to borrow through bonding. To begin the
process for a bond vote the selectboard must first pass a resolution
of public necessity. 24 V.S.A. §1755. All bond votes require special
and additional notice and warning to be provided as directed in 24
V.S.A. §1756. The ballots must be prepared as directed in 24 V.S.A.
§1758. Selectboards and town clerks must provide copies documenting
the various steps to bond counsel. It is wise to confirm that you
have covered all the necessary steps for warning with bond counsel
before the final time for posting of the warnings.
8. Custodians of public records do not have to research or fax
documents. The public records law in 1 V.S.A. §315-318 provides
that custodians of public documents must make documents available to
the public for inspection and copying during reasonable hours. The
law does not require that the custodians fax copies of documents to
anyone, or require that the custodian conduct research to find
documents. While each custodian can establish additional office
practices as a courtesy to the public, we advise towns to discuss
their policies with their town attorney to ensure that these
practices will not create a risk of liability for the town.
9. Selectboard may accept gift or grant without voter approval.
It is our opinion that a selectboard may accept a grant to
purchase property for the town without approval from the voters at
an annual or special meeting. It has been this office’s
advice that where the grant is from a federal or state system which
by law does not expressly provide for a vote of the electorate, the
selectmen could apply for and accept grants on their own initiative.
See also Lawton v. Town of Brattleboro, 128 VT 525 (1970), where the
court found that a vote of the electorate is not always an
indispensable prerequisite to the authority of the selectmen to
function in areas of their official responsibility.
10. Town highways are altered without voter approval. Towns
must carefully follow all of the required statutory procedures to
reclassify a highway from 4 to 3. The procedures to increase
classification are the same as those used to take a highway to a
lower classification or to abandon a road. 19 V.S.A. §§707-717. The
law requires the selectboard to provide notice of the proposed
change, they need to hold a hearing, do a site visit and make a
decision. The voters don’t get to vote on this issue. Rather, if
interested parties are unhappy with the board’s decision they can
appeal to district court who will appoint a commission to decide the
issue. Note that the selectboard can use funds from its town highway
budget to improve the road, if that is necessary to bring the road
up to the new classification standards. A vote of the electorate is
only required if additional funds are needed.
11. Citizens may petition to lay out, discontinue or reclassify a
town road. The law provides that if at least 5% of a town’s
voters and/or landowners petition to have a highway laid out,
altered, reclassified, or discontinued the board must begin the
statutory process. Note that even if the process is started by
petition it is, in the first instance, within the board’s discretion
whether to grant or deny the requested change. (Of course this
decision can be appealed.) 19 V.S.A. §708. The selectboard may order
that the petitioners pay the costs of upgrading a class 4 town
highway to the class 3 town highway standards. 19 V.S.A. § 711.
12. Selectboard is not required to reclassify a class 4 road to a
class 3. In deciding whether to reclassify a road the
selectboard makes a decision according to what it deems is the
public good and necessity. The law specifically provides that a
class 4 highway need not be reclassified to class 3 merely because
there exists within a town one or more class 3 highways with
characteristics similar to the class 4 highway. In considering
whether to reclassify a class 4 highway to class 3, consideration
may be given as to whether the increased traffic and development
potential likely to result from the reclassification is desirable or
is in accordance with the town plan. 19 V.S.A. § 711.
13. Emails are subject to the Public Record Law. The Vermont
Public Record Law broadly defines public record or public document
as "…or any other written or recorded matters produced or acquired
in the course of agency business…" unless the document fits one of
the exceptions listed in the statute. 1 V.S.A. § 317(b). This means
that emails that are written, sent, or received in the course of the
business of the public board or entity or between board members
dealing with board business are public records and must be produced
for inspection upon request. An email must be reviewed or considered
in the same light as a letter would be considered on the same topic.
If a letter on the same subject would become a public record, then
the email is public record. Copies of emails sent and/or received in
the course of board business should be provided to the custodian of
public records for the board so that the public can inspect them
upon request. Note that it does not matter that the emails were sent
or received from home computers.
14. Town manager form of government is adopted in the same way
officers are elected. Vermont law provides that the manner in
which a town votes to either adopt or revoke the town manager system
is determined by the manner in which the town has voted to elect its
town officers. 24 V.S.A. §1242 and 1243. If a town has voted to
elect its officers by Australian Ballot, then any vote on the town
manager system of government is done by Australian Ballot (whether
to adopt or to revoke.) If a town still votes its officers from the
floor by voice vote or paper ballot, then the vote to adopt or
revoke the town manager system is by the floor system of voting. The
legislature decided to "piggyback" the manner of voting to the
manner in which officers are elected rather than dictate Australian
Ballot for all towns.
15. Town manager has broad authority under state law. Chapter
37 of title 24 provides that the manager shall have authority and it
shall be his duty: "to cause duties required of towns and town
school districts and not committed to the care of any particular
officer, to be duly performed and executed . . . and to perform all
duties now conferred by law upon the selectmen . . . except that he
shall not prepare tax bills, sign orders on the general fund of the
town, other than orders for poor relief, call special or annual town
meetings, lay out highways, establish and lay out public parks, make
assessments, award damages, act as member of the board of civil
authority, nor make appointments to fill vacancies which the
selectmen are now authorized by law to fill." 24 V.S.A. § 1236. In
addition the manager is given specific areas of control listed in 24
V.S.A. section 1236 (including being the purchasing agent,
supervising public buildings, accounting for the town and possibly
for the school district, collecting the taxes and delinquent taxes –
if the town so votes, overseeing the roads, the police and fire
departments, maintenance of parks, etc . . . ).
24 V.S.A. §1236.
16. A public board cannot "recess" its meeting for a brief time
in order for board members to leave the room to continue to discuss
board business in private. All board business must be discussed
in public unless it meets the requirements of one of the two
exceptions to the open meeting law executive session or deliberative
session. 1 V.S.A. §312. It is perfectly appropriate for a board to
take a brief recess to allow members to use the facilities, take a
stretch, or return an important telephone call. However, the recess
should not be a ruse so that board members can discuss board
business outside of the hearing of the attending public.
17. Nonbinding questions must be voted in the same way you vote
public questions. A board can put a non-binding question before
the voters at an annual or special meeting. This question must be
voted in the same way the municipality votes its public questions.
If the board wishes it can also raise issues that are non-binding
during the "other business’ portion of the town or annual meeting
agenda.
18. Municipalities can set up recreation systems. There is a
special area in the law devoted to municipal authority over
recreation. It provides that municipalities, singly or jointly, may
establish, maintain and conduct a system of public recreation
including playgrounds. They can buy, lease or accept gifts of land,
buildings or other recreational facilities, they can bond for these
public improvements and they may hire a recreation director and
assistant director. 31 V.S.A. § 202.
19. Municipal recreation programs can be overseen by the
legislative body or a by recreation board. The legislative body
of a municipality can oversee recreation themselves – or through
their town manager or it can establish a recreation board. When the
legislative body establishes the recreation committee or board it
must decide how many members to include and it must determine the
terms of office. The law requires that the terms be staggered so
that the term of one member expires annually.
20. Felons can vote in Vermont and serve in elected office.
With the exception of a conviction for voter or elections fraud no
Vermont law prohibits a felon from voting or serving as an elected
official in Vermont. It is up to the voters to decide whether the
felony conviction is reason to not elect a particular candidate to
office.
In our monthly Opinions we provide what we believe the law requires based
upon our legal judgment, years of observing Vermont’s local government
practices, and Vermont Court decisions. This information is intended as a
reference guide only and should not replace the advice of legal counsel.
Table of Contents | Past Issues
of Opinions | Secretary of State's
Homepage
|
|
Mark Your Calendar with the
Vermont League of Cities and Towns' Upcoming Events! |
|
More information can be found at www.vlct.org, email us at
info@vlct.org or call 800/649-7915 or 802/229-9111.
May 2004
Thursday, May 6 Municipal Attorneys’ Forum
Capitol Plaza Hotel, Montpelier
This forum provides an opportunity for municipal attorneys across the state
to gather and discuss the most pressing issues in municipal law.
Tuesday, May 18 Vermont Municipal E-government Conference
Howard Dean Education Center in Springfield, Lyndon State College in
Lyndon, and UVM in Burlington
It is sponsored by both VLCT and UVM Center for Rural Studies.
Thursday, May 20 Clerks and Treasurers Workshops
Capitol Plaza Hotel, Montpelier
This annual workshop will focus on legislative and policy changes affecting
the
conducting of elections, municipal record keeping, and municipal finance.
June 2004
Thursday, June 10 Planning & Zoning Series #4: Natural Resource Planning
Vermont Interactive TV
This final evening session in the series will illustrate how local tools
such as the town
plan, zoning bylaws, and municipal ordinances can be vital tools for
protecting open
space, shore lands, flood plains, and preserving scenic and historic
features.
Table of Contents | Past Issues
of Opinions | Secretary of State's
Homepage
|
|
May 24-28th is Vermont High
School Voter Registration Week |

Vermont lags behind the nation with only 33% of our young people
voting! In Vermont, voters must take an
oath before a notary to be eligible to vote. This means that our
young people cannot register and vote by mail. For this reason it is
especially important to register our young people to vote before
they leave high school.
During High School Voter Registration Week we are asking
town clerks, and other local officials to go into local high schools
to register new voters. We will also be asking schools to conduct
their own registration drives. To make this easy we can supply you
or your school with voter registration forms, "Your Vote is Your
Voice" buttons and bumper stickers, a short student handout with
important dates and answers to frequently asked questions and a 7
minute video explaining how to vote.
Contact Janel Johnson at
jjohnson@sec.state.vt.us
or by calling 828-1296 for more information about how you can
get involved with this year’s High School Voter Registration
Week.
Order FREE materials for your registration drive online at:
/kids/votevt/hs_reg_drive/hs_voter_week.html
Table of Contents | Past Issues of
Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|
Property Sales and Declaration
of Vermont Homestead |
The new education funding law classifies property as either
homestead or nonresidential. These property classes are subject to
the education tax at different rates. To be taxed at the homestead
rate, the property owner must file a Homestead Declaration with the
Vermont Department of Taxes declaring that he or she is a Vermont
resident who owns and occupies the property as his or her principal
dwelling as of April 1. The Declaration is due each year on or
before April 15. To ensure that property buyers pay the correct
education tax rate and avoid penalty for late-filed Homestead
Declarations, the following actions should be taken:
SALES OCCURRING ON OR BEFORE APRIL 1
· If the purchased property is the buyer’s homestead on April
1, buyer must file a Homestead Declaration (HS-131) on or before
April 15. Note that if the dwelling is newly constructed, the
buyer may need to obtain a School Property Account Number (SPAN)
from the town listers to include on the Homestead Declaration.
· If the purchased property is not the buyer’s homestead on
April 1, buyer should not file a declaration.
· If the sold property was not the seller’s homestead and
seller has not filed a Homestead Declaration, no action needs to
be taken by the seller.
· If the sold property was seller’s homestead and seller filed
a Homestead Declaration, the seller must notify the Department.
SALES OCCURRING AFTER APRIL 1
· If the property was seller’s homestead on April 1 and seller
filed a Homestead Declaration by April 15, no further action is
needed. To confirm that seller has filed a Homestead Declaration,
seller can call 1-866-828-2865 (toll-free in State) or
802-828-2865 (local or out-of-state) for this information.
· If the property was seller’s homestead on April 1 and seller
did not file a Homestead Declaration by April 15, seller is still
required to file. The late payment penalty should be settled at
closing. Filing prior to December 1, may result in a lower tax
bill.
· If the property was not the seller’s homestead on April 1,
and seller did not file a Homestead Declaration, no action should
be taken.
· If the property was not the seller’s homestead on April 1,
but seller filed a Homestead Declaration, seller must notify the
Department and rescind the Declaration. The penalty should be
settled at closing. The town will issue a corrected tax bill based
on the nonresidential tax rate.
For more information please visit the Tax Department's
website:
http://www.state.vt.us/tax/pdf/misc/hs-131withdrawal.pdf
Table of Contents | Past Issues of
Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|
A Special
Apology! |
|
Our apologies to Connie Quimby, Town Clerk of
Concord.
In last month's Opinions we announced she was leaving office and she
is still very much serving the Town of Concord!
We are sorry for the confusion!
Table of
Contents | Past Issues
of Opinions | Secretary
of State's Homepage
|
|
Municipally - Based Community Restorative
Justice
Centers
|
|
The Agency of Human Services provides funding to local restorative
interventions which hold great promise for helping communities to
become safer and more responsive to the needs of their citizens. There
are a growing number of Vermont communities responding to the problems
of crime and conflict with community justice restorative initiatives.
What is Restorative Justice?
Restorative Justice is a philosophy for dealing with the many and
varied levels of conflict, dispute and other issues that affect the
general wellness of a community. It emphasizes direct personal
involvement of all the affected parties in solving conflict and offers
methods for doing so. It is a justice approach, which focuses on the
harms caused by conflict and crime to relationships between people in
the community. Conflict that escalates to the level of crime is
considered primarily as an act against the victim(s) and the
community, and secondarily as a violation of state or federal law.
Restorative justice places the victim(s) and the community centrally
in the resolution of conflict and crime and expects the offender to be
accountable for repairing the harm and damage. It provides processes
and programs that rely on direct participation of all the affected
parties in seeking a just and long lasting solution to a wide variety
of local issues and conflict. It empowers community citizens to work
on the problems that most concern them.
Restorative justice principles resolve problems in non-violent ways
including:
- Those who are Harmed/affected (victims) are Central to the
Process
- Seek to Understand the Harm Done
- Work to Repair the Damage
- Re-Build Relationships with all the People Involved
- Recognize the Solution as a Community Responsibility
- Give Choice and Opportunity toSpeak and Be Heard
Restorative justice applications include:
- school discipline
- neighborhood disputes
- family conflict
- ordinance violations
- alternatives to traditional law enforcement and adjudication in
criminal matters for both juvenile and adults
What is a Community Restorative Justice Center?
A Community Restorative Justice Center is a municipally supported
location (building, office, storefront, etc.) where community members
can seek assistance and support in resolving issues of conflict and
dispute. It is a partnership between citizens, the municipal
government and the state. The center is governed by a diverse citizen
advisory board representing the community it serves, and ordinarily
has a paid part/full time coordinator and clerical staff. School
staff, police, selectboards, neighborhood associations and many other
entities use the services of the Justice Center. The Center recruits
and trains volunteer community members to provide many of the
restorative justice programs and services.
The Center also provides mechanisms and referrals for youthful and
adult offenders to repair the damage they have done and demonstrate
that they can become productive and contributing members to the
community’s well being. Community service may be among such
activities.
Since the Center is citizen governed, it develops programs and
processes specifically tailored to the local community including:
- Programs for citizen dispute resolution, including reparation
panels, justice conferencing, peace circles and mediation;
- Support services to victims;
- Programs to address truancy and other school disciplinary
matters;
- Programs to support youth in prevention activities;
- Reintegration planning for offenders coming back from
incarceration;
- Forums for community discussion of issues of local concern.
Established community justice centers:
Burlington , St Johnsbury, Winooski, Newport, Rutland, Barre,
Montpelier, Brattleboro
Smaller restorative programs:
Hinesburg, Shelburne
Planning grants in process:
Middlebury, Essex, Bennington, Hardwick, Hartford, Lamoille, St.
Albans, Bellows Falls
FOR MORE INFORMATION, PLEASE CONTACT:
David Peebles, Dept Of Corrections, Director, Community &
Restorative Justice
802-241-2261; dpeebles@doc.state.vt.us
Carl Roof, Dept Of Corrections, Regional Director, Eastern Vermont,
Community & Restorative Justice; 802-296-5521;
carlr@doc.state.vt.us
Hans Johnson, Dept Of Corrections, Regional Director, Western
Vermont, Community & Restorative Justice; 802-786-5034;
hansj@doc.state.vt.us
Table of
Contents
| Past Issues
of Opinions | Secretary
of State's
Homepage
|
|
Tip of the Month |
This month's tip is from
Lisa Barrett, Lyndon Town Clerk and Treasurer
The Town of Lyndon is home to Lyndon State College and accordingly we
have many college students on our voter checklist. In May, we obtain a
copy of the graduation program that they print up for their graduation
ceremony. It lists the names of all the graduates. We cross-reference
the names of the graduates to the names on our checklist. For those
graduates appearing on our checklist, we send them a letter of
congratulations, wish them well in their future endeavors, and ask
them to let us know if they will be moving out of Lyndon. We also send
them the standard, postage-paid, postcard. Not only does this help to
keep our checklist accurate, it also gives the town the opportunity to
congratulate our soon-to-be former residents for their accomplishment
as they strike out on their own.
If you have a good tip that you would like to share with our readers
please email it to Sandy Harris at vernontc@sover.net or mail them to:
Sandy Harris- VMCTA President
Town of Vernon
567 Governor Hunt Rd
Vernon, VT 05354
Table of
Contents
| Past Issues
of Opinions | Secretary
of State's
Homepage
|
|
New Stickers Available for 2004 Election ! |
|

This
election we have 4 new stickers to offer towns for use during the 2004
Election cycle.
Keep an eye on the mail for your order form!
Table of
Contents
| Past Issues
of Opinions | Secretary
of State's
Homepage
|
|
Mailing List Updates |
|
Help us
keep our mailing list up to date!
Let us know if:
- your address needs to be updated
- your name is misspelled, or
- you'd rather receive Opinions a week early via email
Send us a note via fax: 802-828-2496,
email:
mlynch@sec.state.vt.us,
or post: 26 Terrace St. Drawer 09, Montpelier, VT 05609-1101 and be
sure to include what your current Opinions mailing label says
as well as any changes that you would like to have made!
Thank you for helping us keep Opinions running efficiently!
Table of
Contents
| Past Issues
of Opinions | Secretary
of State's
Homepage
|
|
|
|
May
2004 Calendar |
|
May 15: Last day for Town Clerk to remit to State Treasurer an
accounting of dog and wolf-hybrid licenses sold and remit the license
fee surcharge for an animal and rabies control program. 20:3581(f)
May 30: Memorial Day. 1:371
May 31: Within 60 days of petition) If a petition for
reconsideration or rescission of a question considered or voted at
Town Meeting has been filed, this is the last day on which a municipal
vote may be held at a duly-warned meeting. 17:2661(b)
Table of Contents
| Past
Issues of Opinions | Secretary of
State's Homepage
|
|
June 2004 Calendar |
June 1:
Deadline for Listers to lodge personal property inventories with Town
Clerk. 32:4007(91st day after Town Meeting election) In towns using
Australian Ballot, Town Clerk may open and destroy used Town Meeting
ballots and tally sheets, except as otherwise provided by law.
17:2590(d)
June 30: End of fiscal year for all school districts, charter
provisions not-withstanding, and for municipalities that have adopted
July 1 through June 30 fiscal year calendar. 32:1, 24:1683(b)(c)
June 30: Within 30 days after completion of a town fiscal year
the Town Clerk shall publicly disclose the total amout of fees
received as part of his or her compensation. 24:1179
Table of Contents
| Past
Issues of Opinions | Secretary of
State's
Homepage
|
|