Office of the Vermont
Secretary of State -
www.sec.state.vt.us
26 Terrace Street,
Montpelier, VT 05609-1101 : Phone 802-828-2363
|
Volume 12,
Number 11
December 2010
|
|
|
Voice From the Vault
by Gregory Sanford |
|
Archival Management: Alchemy or Science?
Once upon a time, alchemy and chemistry used to hang out together.
Even after the publication of Robert Boyle’s The Sceptical Chymist
in 1661, which distinguished chemistry from alchemy, some folks
continued to conflate the two. Hennig Brand, for example, wobbled
between alchemy and chemistry, believing he could convert human urine
into gold. In 1675 he procured fifty buckets of urine and, after a
series of experiments, produced first a noxious paste and then a
translucent waxy substance. The waxy substance tended to either glow
or to burst into flame when exposed to air. Hennig had discovered
phosphorus (a name derived from Greek and Latin and meaning "light
bearing").
While the commercial potential for phosphorous was quickly
recognized, acquiring the necessary raw material in bulk was a
challenge. Soldiers were enlisted to create a sufficient production
stream, but the process was less than ideal. Finally in the 1750s the
noted Swedish chemist Karl Scheele discovered a means of production
that did not involve urine.*
All of which reminds me of various professional discussions on
whether archival management is a science, practice, or what? Certainly
some of our allied professions self-describe themselves as sciences
and one can get a degree in library and/or information "science."
European archivists are more comfortable in calling our profession
"archival science" than practitioners in the U.S., Canada, or
Australia.
I asked several colleagues for their thoughts and most expressed
reservations about "archival science." Canadian archivist Terry Cook
responded, "While two atoms of hydrogen and one of oxygen under the
same physical conditions at any place on earth at any time will
produce one molecule of water, two records creators, one function, and
the need to record evidence of some identical task or transaction in
different countries in different centuries will never produce the same
archival record."
Dr. Cook’s observation is correct when reviewing past, and most
current, archival practice, which often smacks more of alchemy than
science. That is in itself important to know; from creation to
appraisal to description there is constant, and often idiosyncratic,
intervention in a record’s life. As a researcher you are at risk if
you assume that the records held in archives always got there as the
result of a systematic, scientific process and are therefore pure
representations of "the truth."
Closer to home, actually just down the hall from my office, Tanya
Marshall had a different answer based on her work analyzing Vermont
government records—yes, there is, or at least could be, archival
science. Tanya and the record analysts are systematically studying
record creation and breaking our public records down to their basic
elements or facets. A facet can be a record type, a legal requirement,
an activity, a creating entity, a function, a domain, etc. For a
fuller explanation of the classification system go to
http://vermont-archives.org/records/vclas/index.htm.
The accuracy of facets can be tested through observation. For
example, if licensing has been accurately defined as an activity you
should find the same types of records in all licensing activities,
whether you are licensing an attorney or a massage therapist. The
process will always begin with an application and end with a decision.
Within this it is important to adhere to consistent definitions; for
example, you need to be able to distinguish between the activity
"licensing" and the activity "permitting."
This approach allows a more systematic view of records and the
processes that produce them across government. In turn that provides a
structured platform to compare and evaluate business practices and
information flows within government. This, in theory, could aid
government restructuring/re-thinking exercises. Too often, however,
these efforts border on alchemy, believing that by simply changing one
process in isolation or by adding more information technology
government will magically be transformed into a gold standard of
efficiency and effectiveness.
The analysts’ systematic deconstruction of records into base
elements also allows government officials, researchers, and others
more flexibility. Traditional practice is to create an inventory or
finding aid focused on distinct record series, often described without
a larger understanding of legal, administrative and functional
contexts associated with the records. That may work, to continue our
example, if you simply want to know about a specific licensed
architect. It does not work if you want a broader examination of
government’s licensing activities: what do we license, why, and how,
for example. Under the analysts’ system people can experiment with
combining different facets to create new or broader views of
information.
This all may be more than the casual reader wants to know about
archival management, though it is important for everyone to understand
that archival management is, indeed, management. This does not answer
whether archival management can be more science than alchemy. Tanya’s
conceptual model may provide an answer; at a minimum you’re in luck
since her work will turn the dross of public records into, if not into
gold, at least something that is light bearing.
*The story of Hennig Brand is recounted in Bill Bryson’s A Short
History of Nearly Everything.
Table of Contents |
Past Issues of
Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|
Opinions of
Opinions |
|
1. Salaried official must be paid upon request.
Most towns vote to pay some of its officers an hourly rate, (with a
maximum total) and others a salary. Salaried officials are entitled to
the entire salary that has been voted in the budget. Note also that
when an official is voted a salary at town meeting, there is no rule
addressing how that individual is to be paid. In theory, a clerk,
treasurer, constable or other elected official who is voted a salary
could demand payment of the entire year’s salary at the start of the
new fiscal year. That is because a salary is not related to the hourly
work of an official - and if it is voted by the electorate, the town
is obligated to pay the full amount on demand.
2. The clerk is not the clerk of the selectboard.
There is no statutory requirement that the town clerk be the clerk of
the selectboard, however, some clerks take the minutes of the board’s
meetings. In many towns the selectboard hires another person to take
the minutes of its meetings.
3. The selectboard may not set hours for town
clerk. Because the clerk is an independently elected official,
the clerk sets his/her own hours, deciding what he or she believes
will best serve the people of the town. No law would permit the
selectboard to compel the town clerk to work a specific number of
hours per week or specific times during the week. Usually the
selectboard budget contains a recommendation for the clerk’s
compensation. That compensation obviously influences the amount of
hours worked by the clerk, but the clerk determines what those hours
are.
4. Voters may not adopt ordinance. Vermont law
does not give the voters the power to petition for the adoption of an
ordinance. However, although Vermont law permits voters to disapprove
of an ordinance adopted by the board, it does not permit voters to
initiate an ordinance by petition. 24 V.S.A. § 1972 provides that the
select board adopts town ordinances, and gives voters forty-four days
to petition the board for a vote on whether to disapprove the
ordinance. If the ordinance is disapproved by the voters, it does not
go into effect. Voters who want to see a particular regulation in
place must convince the selectboard that it is in the best interest of
the town. The only exception to this rule is conflict of interest
ordinances. Voters may propose, by petition, an ordinance governing
the ethics of board members and other local officials.
5. A board may only go into executive session upon
a motion and vote. An executive session is a closed meeting within
a public meeting. Boards cannot enter executive session without first
meeting in public session and then voting to close the meeting, and
then only for very specific reasons. A majority of the members of a
local board (a two-thirds majority of a state board) must agree to
enter for the reasons stated. This motion and vote must then be
included in the minutes of the meeting, making a permanent record of
the session and its reasons. No action may be taken in executive
session.
6. Justice of the peace terms begin February 1st.
Although justices of the peace have been elected in November, the term
of office for the newly elected JPs does not begin until February 1. A
person elected as a JP can take the oath and return the oath of office
to the town clerk at any time after receipt of the Certificate of
Election, but the person cannot perform any duties of a JP until
February 1.
7. Oath of Office. A justice of the peace is
not fully qualified to serve until he or she has taken the oath of
office and the oath of allegiance and has filed a notarized copy of
those oaths with the town clerk. The Secretary of State provides
copies of these oath forms to every newly elected justice. 4 V.S.A. §
491. (In January we will be mailing JP handbooks and oath forms to
newly elected justices. The guide and forms can also be obtained from
our website www.sec.state.vt.us.)
8. Governor appoints to fill JP vacancies. The
governor may appoint a successor whenever a vacancy occurs in the
office of justice of the peace. A vacancy can occur by resignation,
death, and insanity. A vacancy can also occur when the JP moves to
another state. Moving to another Vermont town in Vermont does not
create a vacancy. In most cases, however, a justice will resign when
he or she leaves town. Governors usually appoint a member of the party
of the former justice of the peace to fill the vacancy - although not
always the person recommended by the party. 17 V.S.A. § 2623.
9. A justice of the peace who performs duties
before filing a copy of his or her oath may be fined. Under 4
V.S.A. § 491, a justice must file a copy of his or her oath with the
town clerk’s office before performing his or her formal duties.
Because the term of office begins on February 1, a justice of the
peace can deliver the oath copy any time after February 1, as long as
no official duties have been performed prior to filing the copy with
the town clerk’s office. There is no automatic fine if a justice fails
to file the oath. It is only when a justice willfully neglects to file
the oath copy with the town clerk that he or she may be fined not more
than $100, and then only after a prosecution is brought by the
attorney general or the district attorney.
10. Only clerk or assistant may record or certify
documents on behalf of the town. By law, there are certain duties
that must be fulfilled by the town clerk. However, the law recognizes
that the clerk may require some assistance in the performance of his
or her duties. Accordingly, 24 V.S.A. § 1170 and 1171 permits the
clerk to appoint one or more assistants who are specifically
authorized to perform the recording and filing duties of the clerk, to
issue licenses and certified copies of record and to perform all other
duties of the clerk in his or her absence. Note that implicit in this
statute is the understanding that someone who is not appointed or
sworn as an assistant town clerk may not perform these functions.
11. Town can require landowners to connect to sewer
system. When a town or city extends its sewer system, it can adopt
an ordinance to require all adjacent property owners to connect to the
public system and abandon private septic systems. 24 V.S.A. § 3509.
The Sewage commissioners may require that the owners of buildings,
subdivisions or developments abutting a public street be connected to
the municipal sewage system.
12. Water and sewer delinquencies can be collected
either by the delinquent tax collector or by disconnecting service.
Municipalities with water and sewer systems may choose to collect
delinquent payments in the same manner as their delinquent taxes are
collected or by using the Uniform Water Disconnect statute. 24 V.S.A.
§ 3504, 5141 et seq. If collected as a tax, the town or city’s
delinquent tax collector may bring a tax sale to collect the amount
owed. Often the water/sewer charge is collected along with any
delinquent taxes owed on the property. In the alternative, the
municipality can shut off the water if a person fails to pay their
charges. This is a more complicated process, and provides the resident
an opportunity to appeal a decision to shut off water.
13. Interest on delinquent water or sewer payments
may only be charged after vote. Water or sewer commissioners in a
town can charge interest on delinquent payments for water and/or sewer
ONLY if the voters of the municipality have approved an article in the
warning to collect interest on overdue taxes in the town. 24 V.S.A. §
5151 and 32 V.S.A. § 5136. The article stays in effect until voted
otherwise at a subsequent meeting. Similarly, the trustees or
prudential committee of a fire district or water district must place
an article on the warning for voters to collect interest on overdue
payments for water and sewer before interest can be collected.
14. Town treasurer should not make out checks
without warrant signed by the board. In one town the selectboard
asked the treasurer to bring already filled out checks to the
selectboard meeting prior to the board’s approval of the individual
expenditures. 24 V.S.A. § 1576. The treasurer was correct to decline.
Indeed, Vermont law only permits the treasurer to make payments based
on properly signed orders of the board or based on certified minutes
of the board, signed by both the board’s clerk and chair or by a
majority of the board, clearly setting out the amount, and to whom
payment is to be made. 24 V.S.A. § 1623.
15. Selectboard may authorize one or more members
to draw orders without meeting. Sometimes a board needs to pay
bills between meetings. In this case the board can, by vote, authorize
one or more of its members to sign orders. The orders must be very
specific, and a report must be given to the board so the entire board
can know what was paid. 24 V.S.A. § 1623.
16. Selectboard may acquire land for conservation
or to strengthen local business. Vermont law permits the
legislative body to acquire property or accept land donated for a
number of purposes, some of which are set out in 10 V.S.A. § 6301.
These purposes include encouraging and assisting the maintenance of
present uses of agricultural, forest and other undeveloped land, and
to prevent the acceleration of residential and commercial development.
It also includes preserving scenic natural resources; strengthening
the base of the recreation industry and increasing employment, income,
business, and investment; and planning for orderly growth.
17. Open government laws apply to RDCs. A
regional development corporation approved by the commissioner of
commerce and community development is subject to Vermont’s open
meeting and public record laws. 1 V.S.A. § 310 et seq. Vermont law
does, however, provide a special exemption to allow regional
development corporations to meet in executive session to consider
proposed transactions or agreements in "furtherance of development
purposes." 24 V.S.A. § 2786. This allows the corporations to meet
privately with potential developers to discuss opportunities for
establishing operations up until a contract or agreement is signed.
18. Board may rule that committee executive
sessions may exclude non-committee members. When a board sets up
committees the open meeting law will apply to the meetings of the
committee. 1 V.S.A. § 312. Committees may go into executive session
where appropriate. The law does not directly address whether a
committee may exclude members of the board from its executive session.
However, the board has the authority to establish its own rules or
policies about who may attend committee executive sessions. It may be
particularly important to have a clearly defined rule for large boards
that have personnel committees that conduct employee evaluations. The
law would permit a board to decide that only members of that
particular committee may attend an executive session, or conversely,
that any board member may attend.
19. Board member who discloses confidential
information cannot be kept from executive session. The law
governing executive sessions does not require board members to keep
the discussions confidential – although this is certainly best
practice. Consequently, there is no authority to keep any board member
out of an executive session — even if that board member breaches
confidentiality. Note that where a board member has breached
confidentiality – particularly in a personnel matter - it may be wise
to ask the board’s attorney to send that board member a letter
explaining the potential liability the municipality could face as the
result of the breach.
20. Non voting ex-officio members of planning
commissions do not count toward quorum requirement. The
selectboard may serve as non-voting, ex-officio members of the
planning commission. 24 V.S.A. § 4322. Although they can be part of
the board, they do not vote. This means that their number will not
count when factoring the numbers necessary to be present to form a
quorum, and their presence will not count toward that quorum.
Accordingly, in a board that has seven appointed (or elected)
commissioners and five non-voting (selectboard) members, whenever
there are four voting commissioners present there is a quorum. (For
general guidance on how to treat ex-officio board members see, Roberts
Rules of Order, § 48.)
21. Minutes of meetings must be available within
five days. The open meeting law requires that minutes be taken at
all public meetings. 1 V.S.A. § 312. This requirement applies to all
public bodies – which not only includes the elected or appointed board
itself, but any committees of the board. 1 V.S.A. § 310(3). Minutes of
public meeting must be made available to members of the public within
5 days of the meeting, even if they are only in draft form.
22. Formal approval of minutes not required by law.
One town was concerned that minutes of a prior meeting were not ever
approved because the new board members did not want to approve minutes
of the prior board meeting which they had not participated. While it
is good practice to approve the minutes of the previous meeting of a
board, Vermont law does not require this approval. Approval of minutes
will give the minutes a greater presumption of accuracy if at a later
date the minutes are needed to prove legal action of the town.
However, failure to have approval will not, alone, call into question
the legality of the board’s decisions.
23. Minutes of meetings are not transcripts.
Vermont law requires minutes to be kept of all public meetings. The
minutes are the legal record of the action taken at the meeting.
Accordingly, the minutes must note all topics and motions that arise
at the meeting. At a minimum the law requires the minutes to list all
"members of the public body present; all other active participants in
the meeting, all motions, proposals and resolutions made, offered and
considered, and what disposition is made of same; and the results of
any votes, with a record of the individual vote of each member if a
roll call is taken." 1 V.S.A. § 312(b). The minutes should not be a
transcript of the meeting or reflect what was said by individuals in
discussion because this often causes confusion and disagreement and it
is not required for the legal record.
24. Minutes of meetings do not need to be posted.
The law does not require minutes of meetings to be posted in the
municipality. Rather, minutes must be available to the public on
request within five working days of the meeting. 1 V.S.A. § 312.
25. Town can hold annual meeting in neighboring
municipality. No law requires town meeting to be held within the
town boundaries. On occasion a town will move its meeting to a
neighboring community because it needed a larger space or a facility
that was accessible to people with disabilities.
Table of Contents |
Past Issues of
Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|
|
|
2011 Centennial Business
Awards |
Is Your Business A Century Old?
If yes, then the Secretary of State
is looking for you!
The Vermont Centennial Business Awards is a
joint project of the Office of the Secretary of State, the Vermont
Chamber of Commerce, and Vermont Business Magazine. Any business
that has operated in Vermont continuously for 100 years or more is
eligible to participate.
The Vermont Centennial Business Award
acknowledges Vermont’s oldest businesses for enriching our economic
heritage. We also hope that this program will deepen our
understanding of how Vermont’s businesses have enhanced our
community life during the last hundred years.
In 2011 we will be presenting awards to the
Vermont businesses that will reach their centennial, as well as
honoring up to 20 of Vermont’s older businesses. Every centennial
business that applies to participate will be recognized.
If you know of a business that qualifies for the
Centennial Business Award, contact the Secretary of State's office
at 802-828-2148 for an application, or visit our website at
www.sec.state.vt.us. The
application deadline is January 14, 2011.
|
|
Civics Behind the Scenes
by Olivia Gay, Civics Education & Vote
Outreach Coordinator |
|
2010 MOCK ELECTION RESULTS
Thanks to teachers and administrators in both private and public
schools, Vermont students again used the Secretary of State’s
materials to hold mock elections across the state. Mirroring the
general trend of less turnout for mid-term elections, many fewer
schools and towns participated than during the presidential election
of 2008. However, those that did participate found it to be a useful
and empowering exercise. The student interns in the Civics Education
office ran a mock election at their own Montpelier High School.
Commenting on her experience at MHS, intern Meghan Wingate observed,
"The mock election was a huge success. These elections really help
students practice exercising their right to vote and often predict the
town’s outcome. We had a large number of the student body voting, and
everyone really enjoyed participating."
For results from schools reporting in various races, as well as
final voting percentages for the major races, check out the 2010 Mock
Election Results on our website at
http://www.sec.state.vt.us/kids/vtvotes/2010_Mock_Election_Results.pdf
Here are some of the results from the mock elections:
Unlike the adult voters, students favored Republican Brian Dubie in
the governor’s race with Dubie receiving 50 percent of the vote and
Democrat Peter Shumlin garnering 36 percent. In the lieutenant
governor’s race, Republican Phil Scott beat Democrat Steve Howard with
43 percent of the vote to Howard's 34 percent.
Democrat Patrick Leahy was the favorite for the Senate, receiving
approximately 54 percent of the students’ vote to 22 percent for
Republican Len Britton. In the House race, Democrat Peter
Welch was the clear winner with about 61 percent of the vote.
Republican Paul Beaudry received 26 percent.
In other statewide races, Jim Condos edged out Jason Gibbs with 48
percent to Gibbs’ 44 percent in the Secretary of State's race.
Incumbents Jeb Spaulding, Tom Salmon and Bill Sorrell also won. Not
surprisingly, students overwhelmingly endorsed the constitutional
amendment to allow 17-year-olds to vote in the primary election if
they will be 18 for the general election, with over 85 percent voting
yes.
Vermont Votes for Kids is a non-profit, non-partisan organization
designed to increase voter turnout and create a better-informed
electorate. For more information about Vermont Votes for Kids or
with questions about this year’s mock election visit
www.VermontVotesForKids.com or contact Olivia Gay at 802-828-1296.
For more information about the Secretary of State’s Office’s Civics
Programs or to order materials
visit
www.sec.state.vt.us
or contact Olivia Gay at 802-828-1296
or email
olivia.gay@sec.state.vt.us
Table of Contents | Past Issues
of Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|
Election Calendar |
|
DECEMBER 2010
December 2 (Thursday) - Last day for U.S. Congressional candidates
to file FEC 30-day post-general reports (Oct. 20-Nov. 28), 2 U.S.C. §
434(a)(2)
December 15 (Wednesday) - Deadline for filing post election
campaign finance reports with the Secretary of State by candidates for
statewide office, state senator, state representative, political
committees, and political parties who have expended or received
$500.00 or more.
Also deadline for filing forty-day post election campaign finance
reports by county office candidates who have made expenditures or
received contributions of $500.00 or more. County candidates (probate
judge, assistant judge, state’s attorney, sheriff, high bailiff and
justice of the peace) shall file with the county clerk with whom his
or her nomination papers were filed. Copies of these reports must be
forwarded by the county clerks to the secretary of state within five
days of receipt. 17 V.S.A. §§ 2811, 2821(c), 2831
If a filing deadline falls on a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday,
then the deadline shall be extended to the next business day. 17 V.S.A.
§ 2103(13) Candidates for the state senator or state representative
must also file such reports with the clerk of the candidates’
respective senate or house district (the same clerk where the
candidate files nominating petitions). 17 V.S.A. § 2811(e)
For the full election calendar, visit
http://vermont-elections.org
Table of Contents | Past Issues
of Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|
Tip of the Month |
|
Temporary Officiant
Authorizations
The Health Department has recommended to town clerks that they file
the temporary officiant permits with the court orders (whether
chronologically or alphabetically is up to them, depending on their
town’s volume). The reason they recommend this is that filing them
with the marriage certificate causes problems since the form is not
the same size as the certificates. If they staple the form to the
certificate, eventually the certificate may rip or get torn since it
will probably be retrieved and copied multiple times over the years.
If you have questions, please contact Richard H. McCoy, Public Health
Statistics Chief, Vermont Department of Health at 802-651-1862 or
richard.mccoy@ahs.state.vt.us
If you have a tip to share, contact Alison Kaiser
at akaiser@townofstowevermont.org
Table of Contents | Past Issues
of Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|
Upcoming Events |
Preparing for A Successful Town Meeting
December 15, 2010
Sponsored by VLCT Municipal Assistance Center
Location: Capitol Plaza Hotel, 100 State Street, Montpelier
Time: 8:30 am
Contact: Jessica Hill (info@vlct.org)
Phone: 802-229-9111
Fax: 802-229-2211
Web site: http://www.vlct.org/d/eventcalendar/workshops/web_Successful
Town Meeting10.pdf
Price: $55 VLCT PACIF members, $80 VLCT Members, $125 Non-members
Town meeting is a wonderful celebration of democracy, local
control, and community, but it can also be stressful for town
officials who are responsible for making sure that its many procedural
requirements are completed correctly. Designed to assist local
officials in conducting a great town meeting, this workshop will cover
town meeting preparation from the planning stages through the meeting
and beyond. It’s designed for all local officials involved in their
annual meeting. Municipal clerks, moderators, selectboard members,
town and city managers, and town administrators are all encouraged to
attend.
Registration/Cancellation deadline is December 8, 2010. Registrations
received (either by mail or on-line) after this date should include an
extra $10.00 per person.
****************************************
Local Government Day in the Legislature
February 16, 2011
Sponsored by VLCT and Vermont Municipal Clerks & Treasurers Assoc.
Location: Capitol Plaza Hotel, 100 State Street, Montpelier
Contact: Jessica Hill ( jhill@vlct.org)
Phone: 802-229-9111
Fax: 802-229-2211
Price: tba
A special day at the Vermont State House for local officials to
hear about the status of pending legislation from VLCT and Vermont
Municipal Clerks’ and Treasurers’ Association representatives, attend
legislative hearings and speak with their representatives and senators
at the Vermont Legislature.
***************************************
Town Meeting Tune-Up
February 23, 2011
Sponsored by VLCT Municipal Assistance Center
Location: Montpelier Elks Lodge
Time: 8:30 am
Contact: Jessica Hill (jhill@vlct.org)
Phone: 802-229-9111
Fax: 802-229-2211
Price: $55. VLCT PACIF, $80. VLCT Members, $125. Non-members
A parliamentarian’s paradise, this annual workshop is designed for
moderators and selectboard members, both seasoned and new. It focuses
on the statutory requirements for town meeting, Robert’s Rules of
Order, and best practices for making it through Town Meeting
unscathed.
******************************************
2010 Democracy Awards
Please join Vermont Secretary of
State Deb Markowitz in honoring those Vermont citizens who have
demonstrated a strong commitment to promoting the tenets of democracy.
Tuesday, December 21, 2010, 3:30 to
5:00 p.m.
Vermont State House - Cedar Creek Room, Montpelier, Vermont
Please RSVP to Ginny Colbert, 802-828-2148 or
gcolbert@sec.state.vt.us
by Thursday, December 16, 2010.
National Association
of Secretaries of State Medallion Awards
Frank Bryan,
University of Vermont - For his commitment to preserving Vermont's
town meeting tradition
Burlington Free Press - For extraordinary coverage of Vermont’s 2010
general election
John Cushing, Milton Town Clerk/Treasurer - For his 40 plus years of
service and leadership in Vermont
Vermont Secretary
of State Enduring Democracy Awards
Ellie Beckett,
Katherine Levasseur, and Courtney Mattison - Student interns—for
their commitment to the successful passage of Proposition 5
Susan Clark, Middlesex Moderator - For her commitment to enhancing
local democracy in Vermont
Table of Contents | Past Issues
of Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|
Quote of the Month |
|
Advice is like snow - the softer it falls, the longer
it dwells upon, and the deeper in sinks into the mind...Samuel Taylor
Coleridge
Table of Contents | Past Issues
of Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|
|
Mailing List Updates |
|
Help us keep our
mailing list up to date!
Let us know if:
- your address needs to be updated
- your name is misspelled, or
- you'd rather receive Opinions a week early via e-mail
Send us a note via fax: 802-828-2496,
email:
gcolbert@sec.state.vt.us,
or post: 26 Terrace St., Montpelier, VT 05609-1101 and be sure to
include what your current Opinions mailing label says as well
as any changes that you would like to have made!
Thank you for helping us keep Opinions running efficiently!
Table of Contents | Past Issues
of Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|