Office of the Vermont
Secretary of State -
www.sec.state.vt.us
26 Terrace Street,
Montpelier, VT 05609-1101 : Phone 802-828-2363
|
|
|
Volume 9,
Number
9 October 2007
|
Message from the Secretary |
Table of Contents |
|

There is a quote that I keep on the bulletin
board behind my desk at the office: "The proper operation of
democratic government requires that public officials and employees
be independent, impartial and responsible to the people; that
government decisions and policy be made in proper channels of the
governmental structure; that public office not be used for personal
gain: and that the public have confidence in the integrity of its
government." I put it up nine years ago when I was first elected
to serve the state. It was a reminder that my job was, well, not
just a job. I am serving in a public office – and because of that I
have a heightened duty to uphold the public trust.
Like those of you who were elected or appointed
to local office, I assumed, before I took office, that it would be
easy to see and avoid the potential pitfalls that can get public
officials into trouble. However, it wasn’t long until I realized
just how challenging it would be to live up to the high standards to
which I ascribed. Shortly after taking office I went to lunch with
an old friend. She took me out in celebration of my new position.
Afterward, as I sat back at my desk, I realized that she wasn’t just
a friend – she was also registered as a lobbyist that represented a
variety of clients – including some associations of professions that
were regulated by my office. I was only in office a month and I had
already slipped up!
At a recent conference for state and local
government officials and employees on government ethics, speakers
talked about how difficult it is to provide a clear definition of
what is unethical behavior. They said things like "you know it when
you see it," or you know whether it passes the "sniff test" or
whether it gives you a stomach ache or keeps you up at night. The
problem, of course, is that some people are better sleepers and have
stronger stomachs than others; and one person’s "know it when you
see it" can be different than another’s personal standard. Even more
challenging is the fact that what may have seemed appropriate at the
time a decision was made, like letting a friend take you out to
lunch, might seem inappropriate when you look back on it after the
fact.
Perhaps this is why ethical conflicts divide communities like few
other issues. It is also why it is important for state and local
government to articulate clear ethical guidelines. And, of course,
it doesn’t hurt to keep a reminder close at hand – like a quote on a
bulletin board.

Deborah L. Markowitz
Secretary of State
Table of Contents
|
Past Issues of
Opinions |
Secretary of State's
Homepage |
Download October 2007
Opinions
in PDF format
(PDF
help)
Add Me to the Email Subscription List!
Message from the Secretary
Voice From the Vault
Opinions of
Opinions
Civics Behind the Scenes
Municipal Law Basics (a sneak peek)
Tip of the Month
Municipal
Calendar
Quote of the Month
Mailing List Updates
Upcoming
Training Opportunities
Opinions
Newsletter Home Page
|
|
|
Voice From the Vault
by Gregory Sanford |
|
The Flight of the Pink Flamingo
My staff, if not quite tolerant of the housekeeping
I apply to my office, at least find it a useful analytical tool for
probing my psyche. Recently a staff member, spying a stack of
yellowing newspapers under my desk, speculated that this was a carry
over from my youth when I must have hidden girlie magazines under my
bed away from the prying eyes of parents (as if this hiding place was
not well known to parents across the ages).
Not so, I hastily defended myself. The pile
reflected articles that caught my fancy as potential material for this
column. Here, for example, was a column from November 2006 decrying
the demise of the pink flamingo lawn ornament two months short of its
50th anniversary. The flamingo was invented by Don Featherstone of
Union Products (he went on to become company president). For
aficionados, the way to tell whether you have an authentic flamingo is
to look for Mr. Featherstone’s signature on the tail.
The article noted how the pink flamingo’s sustained
success was, in part, the result of changing public perceptions of its
value. Once a humble lawn ornament available in 1957 for $2.76, it
became a symbol of American kitsch and, in the hands of baby boomers,
a challenge to the boundaries of high art and good taste. Jenny Price,
the article’s author, linked the flamingo’s demise to its acceptance
by the art community. In the 1990s, for example, the Museum of
Contemporary Art in Los Angeles sold the flamingo in its gift shop.
Mr. Featherstone attributed the demise to more mundane reasons such as
the rising costs of resin and electricity. Since this column is to
inspire rather than depress, I should note that the copyright to the
flamingo has been purchased and a New York company will be resuming
production.
The rise, fall and resurrection of the pink
flamingo lawn ornament could be an analogy for the Archives during my
career. Okay, that may be a stretch but remember I am trying to
justify that pile of yellowing newspapers. The State Archives—indeed,
archives in general—were created as places to preserve and make
accessible essential evidence of the commitments and actions of the
institutions they serve (in my case, state government). As I have
recounted before, over time that initial rationale changed and the
Vermont State Archives became less associated with institutional
evidence than with historical research. When I was hired (October
1982) the Archives, then known as State Papers, primarily focused on
annotating and publishing 18th century records. Just as we applied
changing cultural values to the flamingo, changing popular perception
relegated archives to being a preserve for historians, including the
unfortunate linking of archives to "dark and dusty."
In my early years I applied the skills I had
learned in academic manuscript repositories, arranging and describing
records and creating detailed finding aids to help researchers locate
information. Much of this work reinforced the idea that the archives
was a historical, not institutional, function. In the second phase of
my career we began to promote the Archives as an institutional
resource for providing context to current public dialogues, the
"continuing issues" section of our website being a prime example (http://vermont-archives.org/govhistory/governance/index.htm).
Currently the Archives is engaged in providing guidance for managing
records and information so that essential evidence, born in a digital
world, can be kept accessible. These efforts are reflected in part by
the "managing records" section of our website (http://vermont-archives.org/records/).
The newest effort is a voluntary collaboration
between the Archives in the Secretary of State’s Office and the
Department of Information and Innovation and the Department of
Buildings and General Services (Public Records) within the Agency of
Administration. The goal of the collaboration is to provide guidance
on how to incorporate good recordkeeping practices into paper and
digital systems.
The collaboration launched a newsletter in
September, the first issue explaining our origins and goals and noting
an agreement on policy for managing records in all public agencies (http://vermont-archives.org/records/standards/pdf/RecordsManagementPolicy2007.pdf).
The newsletter can be found at:
http://vermont-archives.org/records/iSTART/newsletter/pdf/iSTARTNewsletter200709.pdf
The October and November issues will look at
recommended file formats for records of continuing value. In December
we will begin to look at policies for managing electronic
communications, such as e-mail.
As a result of these programs, cultural
understandings of the Archives, like those of the flamingo, are
changing again.
Table of Contents |
Past Issues of
Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|
Opinions of
Opinions |
1. Laws that refer to town government will
generally apply to all municipalities. Although most of
Vermont municipal law refers to towns, Vermont statutes provide
that "the laws applicable to the inhabitants and officers of towns
shall be applicable to the inhabitants and similar officers of all
municipal corporations." 1 V.S.A. § 139. This means that a statute
that grants a particular authority to the selectboard will grant
similar powers to the governing board of another kind of
municipality, unless a more specific law (ex. a municipal charter)
applies to the particular municipal corporation.
2. No bidding required for town projects.
Vermont law does not require the selectboard to go through a
public bidding process when they are making contracts or purchases
for the town. However, the board has a fiduciary obligation to the
people of the town that requires them to use the public’s
resources wisely.
3. School districts must bid contracts over
$10,000. Law requires public advertisement of all contracts
over $10,000 or an invitation to bid to three or more vendors or
suppliers. 16 V.S.A. § 559. (If the board receives fewer than
three bids the commissioner of education can grant an exception to
this rule.) For school construction contracts over $500,000, the
board must follow rules established by the state board of
education, and receive suggestions and recommendations on bidders
from the state department of Buildings and General Services. 16
V.S.A. § 559.
4. Board members may not act on their own.
Officials who are elected or appointed to serve on a local board
have authority to take action only as part of the board. The law
provides that "when joint authority is given to three or more, the
concurrence of a majority of such number shall be sufficient and
shall be required in its exercise." 1 V.S.A. § 172. This means
that unless a board authorizes an individual board member to
negotiate a contract or make a public statement about the board’s
policy or position, an individual member of the board does not
have power to negotiate or speak for the board. Goslant v. Town
of Calais, 90 Vt. 114 (1916). (Statements by selectmen acting
independently did not legally obligate the town.) St. George v.
Tilley, 87 Vt. 427 (1914) (Action of one auditor, working
alone has no official force and effect.).
5. Auditors must check books when selectboard
request. Vermont law provides that "at any time in their
discretion, town auditors may, and if requested by the selectboard,
shall, examine and adjust the accounts of any town officer
authorized by law to receive money belonging to the town." 24
V.S.A. § 1686. This means that if the selectboard wants
information about the accounts of any official who receives money
on behalf of the town they do not have to wait until the town
report is prepared to ask the auditors to conduct an audit.
6. An official who fails to give financial
records to the auditors will be ineligible for re-election. If
a municipal official "willfully refuses or neglects" to provide
his or her books, accounts, vouchers or tax bills to the auditors
or the public accountant upon request, he or she will be
"ineligible to re-election for the year ensuing and be subject to
the penalties otherwise prescribed by law." 24 V.S.A. § 1686(c).
7. Town may vote to eliminate office of the
auditor. A town may choose to eliminate the board of auditors
and instead hire a public accountant to perform the audit duties
of the town auditor. 24 V.S.A. § 1686. However, even when a town
chooses to retain the elected board of auditors it is good
practice for every town to engage a public accountant at least
every few years to perform a professional audit of the town books.
8. Towns can borrow for five years or less
without bond. Towns can choose to finance improvements or
assets by borrowing for five years or less without a bond. To do
so the voters must approve the proposed loan at an annual or
special meeting of the town. 24 V.S.A. § 1786a.
9. When necessary the selectboard may borrow
for highway purposes without vote. The selectboard may borrow
from the municipal equipment loan fund to purchase tools,
equipment and materials necessary for the construction,
maintenance or repair of highways and bridges without a prior
vote. 24 V.S.A. § 1786a (b).
10. Special meeting agenda may not be changed
prior to the meeting. A board may make last minute changes to
the agenda of its regularly scheduled meetings. However, when the
board schedules a special meeting the agenda cannot be changed.
The two kinds of meetings are treated differently because all the
open meeting law requires of a regular meeting is that an agenda
be available sometime before the meeting. 1 V.S.A. § 312 (c)(1),
(d). It is not unreasonable to make last minute changes to an
agenda - so long as it is done with enough time for interested
members of the public to be apprised of the change. However, the
open meeting law specifically requires that the reason for a
special meeting be part of the public notice of the special
meeting. 1 V.S.A. § 312(c)(2). This means that for special
meetings the board must stick to discussing only those topics
included in the public notice.
11. Agenda must provide specific topics to be
covered. An agenda for a board meeting must give board members
and members of the public an idea of what is to be covered at the
board meeting. The agenda should not say merely "old business/new
business." Rather, the agenda must list the topics that the board
anticipates to cover. Some boards use similar agendas each month
because they go over the same topics at each meeting. Other
boards’ agendas vary greatly from meeting to meeting.
12. Subcommittees must follow the open meeting
law. All public bodies must follow the requirements of the
open meeting law. 1 V.S.A. § 312. A "public body" means any board,
council or commission of the state or one or more of its political
subdivisions, any board, council or commission of any agency,
authority or instrumentality of the state or one or more of its
political subdivisions, or any committee of any of the foregoing
boards, councils or commissions. . . ." 1 V.S.A. § 310(3).
13. Listers must keep minutes of their
meetings. Like all municipal boards, the listers meetings are
subject to the requirements of the open meeting law. Among its
other requirements, the open meeting law requires that minutes be
taken at all meetings of public bodies. At a minimum, the minutes
must include the following information: all members of the public
body present; all other active participants in the meeting; all
motions, proposals and resolutions made, offered and considered,
and what disposition is made of same; and the results of any
votes, with a record of the individual vote of each member if a
roll call is taken. 1 V.S.A. § 312(b)(1).
14. Administrative work does not require public
meeting. The requirements of the open meeting law do not apply
to site inspections for the purpose of making tax assessments or
abatements, clerical work, or work assignments of staff or other
personnel. In addition, the law permits routine day-to-day
administrative matters that do not require action by the public
body, to be conducted outside a duly warned meeting, provided that
no money is appropriated, expended, or encumbered. 1 V.S.A. §
312(g).
15. Most deliberations of a quasi-judicial
board are not subject to the open meeting law. The open
meeting law exempts the deliberations of a quasi-judicial board
when the decision is to be in writing. This means that the board
may deliberate over the phone, by e-mail or at a meeting that has
not been publicly noticed. The public’s right to know is preserved
by the fact that there must be a written decision that states what
the board decided as well as the rationale for its decision. 1
V.S.A. § 312.
16. A quasi-judicial board determines
individual rights and obligations in specific cases. According
to Vermont law, a quasi-judicial proceeding means "a case in which
the legal rights of one or more persons who are granted party
status are adjudicated, which is conducted in such a way that all
parties have opportunity to present evidence and to cross-examine
witnesses presented by other parties, which results in a written
decision, and the result of which is appealable by a party to a
higher authority and contested case under VT Administrative
Procedures Act." 1 V.S.A. § 310(5).
17. Planning commissioner who moves may remain
on the planning commission. Vermont law does not require
members of the planning commission to be residents of the town
that they serve. 24 V.S.A. § 4322 (At least a majority of the
planning commission must be residents of the town.) Consequently,
the selectboard may choose to retain a planning commission member
even though he or she has moved to a new community.
18. Only board members may make motions at a
board meeting. A selectboard meeting is a meeting of the board
members and not a meeting of the voters. This means that only
board members may set the meeting agenda, make motions and vote on
agenda items. Indeed, although the public is entitled to be
present and may comment on the business before the board (except
for executive session matters) the public’s participation can be
strictly controlled by the chair in order to permit the board to
conduct its business effectively. 1 V.S.A. § 312(h). Note that
this is different from Town Meeting which is a meeting of the
voters of the town, and at which voters may make motions and vote
from the floor.
19. Selectboard can decide to pave road without
town vote. It is the responsibility of the selectboard to
construct and maintain the roads of the town. Although there is a
public process involved when a board wishes to change the
classification of a town highway, no public process is required
(beyond a decision made during a public meeting of the board) when
the board decides that a particular road should be paved. 19 V.S.A.
§ 304.
20. Landowner can gate a town road with
selectboard’s permission. The selectboard can create pent
roads in a town by granting permission to a landowner to erect
stiles, or unlocked gates and bars on a town road. Landowners used
to request the board to permit them to gate a road when they owned
both sides of a highway and used the fields for grazing. Today,
most requests for pent roads are made in an effort to slow down
ATV traffic on class 4 roads and trails. The board can make
regulations governing the use of pent roads and can establish
penalties not to exceed $50.00, for noncompliance. The permission
to pent a road must be given in writing and it must be recorded in
the town clerk’s office. 19 V.S.A. § 304(5).
21. Parking regulations must be made by
ordinance. The selectboard has the authority to regulate
parking on town roads. Although the law specifies that the board
can make "special regulations as to the operation, use and parking
of motor vehicles on highways under their jurisdiction," courts
have said that these regulations must be made by ordinance. 19
V.S.A. § 304(6).
22. Property tax exemptions for volunteer fire
department property must be voted at town meeting. 32 V.S.A.
§3840. Property tax exemptions for the volunteer fire department
must be voted at town meeting. The voters can establish the
exemption for up to ten years at the first vote and thereafter for
five-year periods. The Vermont Listers Handbook provides a good
discussion of property tax exemptions including a chart giving the
source of funding for education property tax liability for locally
voted exemptions. The handbook also includes a chapter on
properties that are exempt under state or federal law, and another
chapter on exemptions that must be voted by the town.
23. Building rented by church for recreational
program is not exempt from property tax. The law permits
property owned or "kept" by a church to be exempt from local
property taxes if it is used for specific purposes listed in the
law. Even if rental property can be considered property "kept" by
the church, the recreational center would not be exempt because
the law does not exempt property held by a church for recreational
uses. 32 V.S.A. § 3832(2). It is an open question whether it may
be possible to exempt the property from taxation through town
vote. That is because although property used for recreational
purposes may be exempt by vote of the town, the use of property is
generally determined by looking at the owner – not the occupant.
In this case the owner is using the property as rental property,
which is not exempt. 32 V.S.A. § 3832(7).
24. Church must pay taxes on property purchased
from non-exempt landowner after April 1st. When a
church or other exempt organization purchases or is given property
mid-year it will not be exempt from taxation until the following
April 1st. Not only do the statutes not
provide a mechanism for granting an exemption mid-year, but the
change in status of the owners is not covered by any of the
reasons for abatement given in 24 V.S.A. §1535. This means that
the board of abatement would not be able to abate those taxes.
When the listers prepare the next year’s grand list, the property
can be listed as exempt under 32 V.S.A. §3802(4) and 3832.
25. Adverse possession of town property possible in rare
situation that town property is not committed to public use.
Last month we stated the general rule that public land cannot be
acquired through adverse possession, This is because lands given
to a public use are exempted from adverse possession claims by 12
V.S.A. § 462. However, it is possible (although rare) that a town
could have property that is not "given to a public use" that can
be aquired by another through adverse possession. Jarvis v.
Gillespie, 155 Vt. 633 (1991).
In our monthly Opinions, we provide what we
believe the law requires based upon our legal judgment, years of
observing Vermont's local government practices, and Vermont Court
decisions. This information is intended as a reference guide only
and should not replace the advice of legal counsel.
Table of Contents | Past Issues
of Opinions | Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|
|
|
|
Civics Behind the Scenes
by Missy Shea, Civics Education & Vote
Outreach Coordinator |
The other day at the checkout in a local market, I
picked up a magazine I hadn’t seen before, Women’s Adventure.
I’m an avid outdoors person, and could tell by the article headlines
on the cover that I would enjoy reading it. What I didn’t know was
that the magazine is also civically-minded.
I was pleasantly surprised to find a call-to-action
article entitled "Jumpstart Your Vote," encouraging the mostly-female
readership to first register to vote, then to become informed about
the issues and the candidates. It pointed out that women can get
involved in creating positive change through the simple act of voting.
I wasn’t as pleasantly surprised to read some specifics about women
and voting. After reading the article and checking out the various
websites to which it referred, I was sharply reminded that we need to
continue to work diligently to promote and protect our right to vote.
I learned that in the late 1960s, when in
particular the youth of our nation was so focused on obtaining equal
rights for people of color, women, and the economically disadvantaged,
nearly 68% of women voted in the national election; in 2004 that
number fell to just over 60%. From the website Women’s Voices, Women
Vote, I learned that adult single women, classified as "women on their
own," are the largest group of non-voters in the democratic process.
Twenty million of them didn’t bother to vote in the 2004 election, and
15 million more remain unregistered. The act of voting, as well as the
education and encouragement of getting others to vote, is our
collective civic responsibility. We can’t take it for granted that
someone else will do it for us.
So, rather than get frustrated every time we hear
or see a political advertisement for the 2008 election, let it serve
as a reminder that we don’t have much time left to become informed
about issues and candidates. Let it inspire us to encourage others to
vote, too.
For more information, check out the following:
- Vermont Secretary of State, Elections and Kids’ Pages,
www.sec.state.vt.us
- Project Vote Smart,
www.vote-smart.org
- League of Women Voters, information site,
www.vote411.org
- Declare Yourself, focus on young voters,
www.declareyourself.org
- Women’s Voices, Women Vote, focus on single women voters,
www.wvwv.org
For more information about the Secretary of State’s Office’s Civics
Programs
Visit
www.sec.state.vt.us
or contact Missy Shea at 802-828-1296
or email
mshea@sec.state.vt.us
Table of Contents | Past Issues
of Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|
Municipal Law Basics
by Deborah L. Markowitz, Secretary of State |
|
Vermont local governments are governed by many different laws,
policies, court cases and charters. This is a preview of the first
sections of short publication that seeks to clarify for local
officials the basic principals that apply to our municipal
governments. We hope to have the completed publication available to
Vermont municipalities within the next few months.
A. What is a municipality?
By definition a municipality is "a political unit,
such as a city, town, or village, incorporated (by the state) for
local self-government or a body of officials appointed to manage the
affairs of a local political unit." According to Vermont law
"municipality" includes a city, town, town school district,
incorporated school or fire district or incorporated village and all
other governmental incorporated units." 1 V.S.A. § 126. Most Vermont
towns received their municipal incorporation (their land grant
charter) from King George in the 1700s. Villages, counties, fire
districts, solid waste districts, insect control district,
incorporated school districts, and other non-chartered municipalities
are entities that were created (incorporated) by legislative act or by
a process established by statute.
Although most of Vermont municipal law refers to
towns, Vermont statutes provide that "the laws applicable to the
inhabitants and officers of towns shall be applicable to the
inhabitants and similar officers of all municipal corporations." 1
V.S.A. § 139. This means that a statute that grants a particular
authority to the selectboard will grant similar powers to the
governing board of another kind of municipality, unless a more
specific law applies to the particular municipal corporation.
Not every entity in our towns is a municipal
corporation. For example, volunteer fire departments and incorporated
public libraries are nonprofit corporations. Even though they receive
public funds to operate they are not municipalities and the general
rules that apply to municipalities, such as the open meeting law and
the public records act, will not apply to them.
B. The Powers of Local Government.
1. Municipal Authority to Act is Controlled by
the State.
Vermont courts have consistently adhered to the
so-called Dillon’s rule. Dillon’s rule is a set of principles
related to municipal power formulated in 1872 by an acclaimed
local government legal scholar, Judge John Forest Dillon.
As early as 1931, the Vermont Supreme Court, in
its opinion Valcour v. Village of Morrisville, quoted Judge
Dillion’s publication Municipal Corporations (5th ed.); "It
is a general and undisputed proposition of law that a municipal
corporation possesses and can exercise the following powers, and
no others: First, those granted in express words;
second, those necessarily or fairly implied in or
incident to the powers expressly granted; third, those
essential to the accomplishment of the declared objects and
purposes of the corporation—not simply convenient, but
indispensable." The Vermont court held that Dillon’s rule calls
for a strict construction of municipal function: "[I]f any fair,
reasonable, substantial doubt exists concerning this question it
must be resolved against the [grant of power]." Valcour v.
Village of Morrisville, 104 Vt. 119,
131—32 (1932); see also Hinesburg Sand & Gravel Co. v. Town of
Hinesburg, 135 Vt. 484,
486 (1977).
This means that the town, and its voters or
selectboard have no authority beyond that which is given by
statute, or that which is necessarily implied by a statute.
Accordingly, municipal officials must check all relevant statutes
before acting to ensure that they will comply with the specific
requirements of the enabling legislation. See e.g., Robes v.
Town of Hartford, 161 Vt. 187 (1993); Flanders Lumber and
Building Supply Co. v. Town of Milton, 128 Vt. 38, 45 (1969).
In addition, whenever Vermont statutes set out the specific
process that a municipality must follow in order to act (as when
it adopts, amends or repeals its zoning and subdivision bylaws)
there must be "substantial compliance" with these procedures or
the action may later be challenged for legal insufficiency.
Town of Charlotte v. Richter, 128 Vt. 270, 271 (1970).
The Vermont Supreme Court has also made it
clear that, unless a statute clearly gives a municipality
authority over a particular matter, it must yield to state
control. In Morse v. Vermont Division of State Buildings,
136 Vt. 253 (1978) the court said "[a]s between the state and
local units of government, the municipal bodies’ power is
derivative, based upon an allocation of authority from the state.
Where conflict occurs, and no resolution is statutorily
prescribed, the municipality must yield." See also, City of
South Burlington v. Vermont Electric Power Co. 133 Vt. 438
(1975) ("local municipalities should play a secondary role where a
clash of authority appears to exist between state control and
local control . . ..")
2. Municipal Authority is Governed by the
Constitution, Statutes and Case Law.
The United State Constitution is the highest
law of the land. The Vermont Constitution is the highest law of
Vermont, second only to the United States Constitution. A Vermont
law is invalid if it violates either constitution, and actions of
government officials, including local government officials must
follow the requirements of the constitution.
For example, the First Amendment to the United
States Constitution includes a guarantee of free speech and
association. The provision prevents a municipality from
prohibiting certain individuals from speaking at public meetings
or posting notices on a public bulletin board solely because of
the ideas that person was espousing. (The municipality could
prevent the speech or posting, however, because it was taking up
too much time or space, or because it was threatening or
libelous.)
3. Not All Municipalities Follow the Same Laws.
Some municipalities have special laws that apply only to them.
This can be a special statute or a governance charter adopted by
the legislature for the municipality. Generally speaking, a
special law or charter will take precedence over the general law
if the two conflict.
Table of Contents | Past Issues
of Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|
Tip of
the Month |
|
Welcome New VMCTA Officers!
New officers for the Vermont Municipal Clerks and Treasurers
Association have been announced. Please join us as we congratulate
them and offer support as they undertake their new duties.
- President – John P. Cushing
- 1st Vice President – Alison Kaiser
- 2nd Vice President – Sandy Pinsonault
- Secretary – Georgette Wolf-Ludwig
- Treasurer – Donna Kelty
- Auditor – Bonnie Reynolds
Executive Board Members –
- Ruth Miller
- Gary Snider
- Monica Yeamens
- Connie Quimby
- Priscilla Aldrich
- Susan Johnson
- Lucrecia Wonsor
- Cynthia Gibbs
- Clyde A. Jenne, Past President
Please send your Tip of the Month to John Cushing of Milton at
jcushing@town.milton.vt.us
or call him at 802-893-4111.
Table of Contents | Past Issues
of Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|
Municipal Calendar |
|
October 2007
8 - Columbus Day. 1:371
25 - State Withholding Tax Return is due (actual date by which
return must be postmarked is shown on the printed form) if
reporting less than $2,500 per quarter. More than $2,500 requires
monthly report; more than $9,000 requires semi-weekly report.
32:5842
31 - Last day to file Form 941 (Quarterly Withholding Return)
with the IRS.
November 2007
11 - Veterans Day. 1:371
22 - Thanksgiving Day. 1:371
The Municipal Calendar is provided by the Vermont League of Cities
and Towns/Chittenden Bank and the Secretary of State's Office.
Table of Contents | Past Issues
of Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|
Quote of the Month |
|
"Happiness is nothing more than good health and a bad memory."
- Albert Schweitzer
Table of Contents | Past Issues
of Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|
Mailing List Updates |
Help us
keep our mailing list up to date!
Let us know if:
- your address needs to be updated
- your name is misspelled, or
- you'd rather receive Opinions a week early via e-mail
Send us a note via fax: 802-828-2496,
email:
gcolbert@sec.state.vt.us,
or post: 26 Terrace St., Montpelier, VT 05609-1101 and be
sure to include what your current Opinions mailing label says
as well as any changes that you would like to have made!
Thank you for helping us keep Opinions running efficiently!
Table of Contents | Past Issues
of Opinions |
Secretary of State's Homepage
|
|
|
|
Upcoming Training Opportunities |
Vermont's Energy Future - Regional Workshops
Vermont wants your help in shaping the future mix of electricity sources for
the state. Five evening public workshops will be held in locations throughout
the state this fall. These workshops were authorized by the Vermont
Legislature, endorsed by the Governor, and spearheaded by the Department of
Public Service. The goal of the workshops is to gather informed and thoughtful
citizen and ratepayer input for the State and its electric utilities as they
make decisions about how and where Vermont obtains its electric power for the
coming decades. All workshops run from 5:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m.
Oct. 3, 2007 - St. Johnsbury Elementary School
Oct. 17, 2007 - South Burlington High School
Oct. 18, 2007 - Montpelier Elks Club, Montpelier, VT
Oct. 29, 2007 - Dean Technical Center, Springfield, VT
Oct. 30, 2007 - Rutland Intermediate School, Rutland, VT
Please register and attend the workshop closest to you. Attendance is free, but
registration is required. To ensure broad and diverse participation from across
the state, participants may only register for one workshop. You may register
online at
http://www.publicservice.vermont.gov/ or call the Department of Public
Service at 1-800-622-4496 (in-state) or 802-828-2332.
___________________________________________________________________________________________________
Vermont League of Cities and Towns - 2007 Town Fair
Thursday, October 11
Robert E. Miller Expo Center, Champlain Valley Fairgrounds, Essex Junction,
Vermont.
Exhibitor and attendee information is available at
http://www.vlct.org/eventscalendar/townfair/
For more information about the 2007 Town Fair, please contact:
Jessica Hill, VLCT Administrative Services Manager
jhill@vlct.org or 802-229-9111
www.vlct.org
____________________________________________________________________________________________________
- Northeast Conference on Flood Hazards, Liabilities
& Opportunities
October 15, 2007
Sponsored by VT DEC River Mgmt. Program, Land Use Institute, Two Rivers-Ottauquechee
Reg. Commission, VLCT
Location: Vermont Law School, South Royalton
Contact: Jane A. D’Antonio ( jdantonio@vermontlaw.edu)
Phone: 802-831-1217
Fax: 802-763-2940
Website:
http://www.vermontlaw.edu/landuse
This conference will provide municipal officials and attorneys with key
information they need to understand flood hazards in Vermont and the
liabilities associated with municipal and landowner actions. Flood hazard
professionals and policymakers from the state, regional, and national levels
will be invited to share their experience and participate in discussions on how
to advance opportunities for municipalities to minimize local costs and the
liabilities associated with floods.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
Managing the Municipal Highway System
November 1, 2007
Location: Elks Club in Montpelier, VT
Coordinating Organization(s): Vermont League of Cities and Towns
http://www.vlct.org/
Cost and Time: TBA
Contact: Jessica Hill at Vermont League of Cities and Towns
Phone: 802-229-9111
Email: jhill@vlct.org
Website:
http://www.vlct.org/eventscalendar/upcomingevents/?event=97
This workshop will provide a primer on municipal
highway law and explore perennial topics such as all terrain vehicles,
connections with land use regulations, and development of alternative
transportation systems.
|
|
|
|
|
|